PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCFOX vs. LZISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCFOX vs. LZISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WCM Focused International Opportunities Fund (WCFOX) and Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCFOX achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly lower than LZISX's 18.32% return.


WCFOX

1D
3.83%
1M
-4.48%
6M
3.38%
YTD
9.66%
1Y
16.07%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
4.13%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.69%

LZISX

1D
3.55%
1M
-6.00%
6M
8.86%
YTD
18.32%
1Y
26.20%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
7.17%
ALL TIME*
6.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WCFOX vs. LZISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WCFOX
WCM Focused International Opportunities Fund
9.66%31.45%6.14%25.65%-35.42%7.30%
LZISX
Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio
18.32%35.95%-3.68%11.59%-26.34%0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between WCFOX and LZISX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021

0.84

The correlation between WCFOX and LZISX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCFOX vs. LZISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WCFOX
WCFOX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
WCFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
WCFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

LZISX
LZISX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
LZISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZISX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
LZISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZISX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WCFOX vs. LZISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WCM Focused International Opportunities Fund (WCFOX) and Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WCFOXLZISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.22

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

2.11

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

7.16

-4.07

WCFOX vs. LZISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCFOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the LZISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCFOX and LZISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WCFOX vs. LZISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCFOX drawdown since its inception was -49.83%, smaller than the maximum LZISX drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCFOX and LZISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCFOXLZISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.83%

-65.43%

+15.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.13%

-12.57%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-15.88%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.83%

-42.01%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.33%

-9.47%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.16%

-14.73%

-6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.82%

3.70%

+1.12%

Volatility

WCFOX vs. LZISX - Volatility Comparison

WCM Focused International Opportunities Fund (WCFOX) has a higher volatility of 8.09% compared to Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio (LZISX) at 7.67%. This indicates that WCFOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCFOXLZISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.09%

7.67%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.03%

17.74%

+2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.30%

21.48%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.91%

18.02%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.68%

17.04%

+4.64%

WCFOX vs. LZISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCFOX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LZISX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCFOX vs. LZISX - Dividend Comparison

WCFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than LZISX's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LZISX
Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio
1.62%1.91%1.89%2.08%5.44%36.78%2.07%2.10%4.62%0.00%2.96%0.69%
WCFOX
WCM Focused International Opportunities Fund
0.30%0.33%3.57%0.24%0.00%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCFOX and LZISX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WCFOX has higher volatility (8.09%) compared to LZISX (7.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCFOX dropped -49.83% vs LZISX's -65.43%.

LZISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCFOX and LZISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer