PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCEO vs. ROSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCEO vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCEO achieves a 13.94% return, which is significantly lower than ROSC's 17.76% return.


WCEO

1D
0.82%
1M
4.13%
YTD
13.94%
6M
12.04%
1Y
28.53%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
10Y*

ROSC

1D
0.95%
1M
4.55%
YTD
17.76%
6M
15.56%
1Y
35.08%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
11.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCEO vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WCEO
Hypatia Women CEO ETF
13.94%9.77%8.28%10.51%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
17.76%10.18%7.28%15.91%

Correlation

The correlation between WCEO and ROSC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2023

0.91

The correlation between WCEO and ROSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

WCEO vs. ROSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WCEO
ROSC

Technology

18.3%
13.0%

Financial Services

16.1%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

14.5%
14.6%

Industrials

13.0%
11.0%

Healthcare

10.6%
20.0%

Energy

6.8%
3.2%

Real Estate

6.0%
5.6%

Basic Materials

5.2%
2.6%

Communication Services

4.5%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
6.4%

Utilities

2.0%
1.9%

Technology

WCEO
18.3%
ROSC
13.0%

Financial Services

WCEO
16.1%
ROSC
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

WCEO
14.5%
ROSC
14.6%

Industrials

WCEO
13.0%
ROSC
11.0%

Healthcare

WCEO
10.6%
ROSC
20.0%

Energy

WCEO
6.8%
ROSC
3.2%

Real Estate

WCEO
6.0%
ROSC
5.6%

Basic Materials

WCEO
5.2%
ROSC
2.6%

Communication Services

WCEO
4.5%
ROSC
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

WCEO
3.0%
ROSC
6.4%

Utilities

WCEO
2.0%
ROSC
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCEO vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCEO
WCEO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
WCEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WCEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ROSC
ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCEO vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WCEOROSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

4.55

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.82

14.84

-2.02

WCEO vs. ROSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the ROSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCEO and ROSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WCEO vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCEO drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, smaller than the maximum ROSC drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCEO and ROSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCEOROSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.88%

-43.13%

+17.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

-7.75%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.88%

-23.74%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-7.18%

+1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

2.37%

-0.14%

Volatility

WCEO vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison

Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) have volatilities of 3.74% and 3.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCEOROSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

3.60%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

10.43%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.21%

15.49%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

19.29%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

20.24%

-2.17%

WCEO vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCEO vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison

WCEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than ROSC's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.77%2.08%2.00%2.01%1.51%2.13%1.75%3.05%2.86%2.13%2.20%2.48%
WCEO
Hypatia Women CEO ETF
0.56%0.64%0.88%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCEO and ROSC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WCEO has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to ROSC (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCEO dropped -25.88% vs ROSC's -43.13%.

On 3-year performance, ROSC leads with 17.79% vs 15.50% for WCEO. On fees, ROSC is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 17.79% return vs 15.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROSC is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WCEO.

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.56% for WCEO.

They also come from different issuers: Hypatia Capital and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for WCEO and 0.34% for ROSC.

ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCEO and ROSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer