WCEO vs. RB
WCEO (Hypatia Women CEO ETF) and RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WCEO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Hypatia Capital, while RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000. WCEO is actively managed, while RB is passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCEO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RB.
Performance
WCEO vs. RB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCEO achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly higher than RB's 6.76% return.
WCEO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 29.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WCEO vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF | 11.34% | 12.47% |
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 6.76% | 10.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCEO and RB is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCEO vs. RB — Risk / Return Rank
WCEO
RB
WCEO vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCEO | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCEO | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 3.15 | -2.48 |
Drawdowns
WCEO vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCEO drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCEO and RB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCEO | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -1.70% | -24.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.47% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -0.41% | -5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | — | — |
Volatility
WCEO vs. RB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCEO | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 6.21% | +9.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 6.21% | +11.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 6.21% | +11.92% |
WCEO vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCEO vs. RB - Dividend Comparison
WCEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than RB's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 2.00% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.88% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCEO and RB have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WCEO.
RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.58% for WCEO.
WCEO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Hypatia Capital and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for WCEO and 0.58% for RB.
Find the right allocation for WCEO and RB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer