WCEO vs. ASCE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WCEO (Hypatia Women CEO ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WCEO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.

Performance

WCEO vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCEO achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 22.25% return.

WCEO

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 2.32%
• YTD: 11.34%
• 6M: 12.19%
• 1Y: 29.95%
• 3Y*: 14.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASCE

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 22.25%
• 6M: 21.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCEO vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF	11.34%	8.94%
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	22.25%	8.61%

Correlation

The correlation between WCEO and ASCE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

WCEO vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCEO

WCEO Risk / Return Rank: 66
WCEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
WCEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
WCEO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
WCEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
WCEO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCEO vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WCEO	ASCE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.33	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.47	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WCEO	ASCE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	1.92	-1.25

Drawdowns

WCEO vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCEO drawdown since its inception was -25.88%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCEO and ASCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCEO	ASCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.88%	-9.22%	-16.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	-0.38%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.52%	-2.10%	-3.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WCEO	ASCE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.34%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.22%	19.25%	-4.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.13%	19.25%	-1.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.13%	19.25%	-1.12%

WCEO vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCEO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCEO vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison

WCEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than ASCE's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.18%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF	0.58%	0.64%	0.88%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCEO and ASCE in my portfolio?

WCEO and ASCE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WCEO or ASCE?

On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCEO or ASCE?

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WCEO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCEO or ASCE?

WCEO has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.

What is the main difference between WCEO and ASCE?

They also come from different issuers: Hypatia Capital and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for WCEO and 0.38% for ASCE.