PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCCFX vs. SICIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCCFX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (WCCFX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCCFX achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than SICIX's 3.12% return. Over the past 10 years, WCCFX has underperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 2.34%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.38% annualized return.


WCCFX

1D
0.65%
1M
-2.22%
6M
-0.13%
YTD
1.83%
1Y
7.14%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*
2.34%
ALL TIME*
1.44%

SICIX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.56%
6M
1.92%
YTD
3.12%
1Y
6.57%
3Y*
6.28%
5Y*
3.16%
10Y*
3.38%
ALL TIME*
3.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WCCFX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WCCFX
Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund
1.83%8.15%3.29%5.96%-13.92%2.63%8.75%10.72%-4.34%5.74%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
3.12%8.12%5.52%5.29%-6.23%4.13%2.62%9.36%-2.07%5.13%

Correlation

The correlation between WCCFX and SICIX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.79

The correlation between WCCFX and SICIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCCFX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WCCFX
WCCFX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
WCCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
WCCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SICIX
SICIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WCCFX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (WCCFX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WCCFXSICIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.45

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

2.47

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.61

9.40

-4.78

WCCFX vs. SICIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the SICIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCCFX and SICIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WCCFX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCCFX drawdown since its inception was -17.64%, smaller than the maximum SICIX drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCCFX and SICIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCCFXSICIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.64%

-27.62%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.35%

-2.65%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.88%

-2.74%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.64%

-10.94%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.64%

-11.61%

-6.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.73%

-0.09%

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-3.55%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

0.69%

+0.73%

Volatility

WCCFX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund (WCCFX) has a higher volatility of 2.38% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 0.68%. This indicates that WCCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCCFXSICIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.38%

0.68%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.96%

2.18%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.35%

2.81%

+3.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

3.89%

+2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.25%

3.90%

+1.35%

WCCFX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCCFX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCCFX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison

WCCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than SICIX's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.89%2.87%3.67%2.80%4.69%3.46%1.84%2.91%1.80%1.81%1.64%1.97%
WCCFX
Allspring Spectrum Income Allocation Fund
2.49%2.99%2.56%2.22%3.41%5.98%6.19%1.81%5.05%5.54%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCCFX and SICIX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WCCFX has higher volatility (2.38%) compared to SICIX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCCFX dropped -17.64% vs SICIX's -27.62%.

SICIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCCFX and SICIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer