WCBR vs. XT
WCBR (WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - WCBR tracks the WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WCBR returned 9.81%/yr vs 8.42%/yr for XT. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCBR charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.
Performance
WCBR vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a 26.82% return, which is significantly higher than XT's 20.20% return.
WCBR
- 1D
- -3.87%
- 1M
- 30.04%
- YTD
- 26.82%
- 6M
- 19.91%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- —
XT
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 20.20%
- 6M
- 20.54%
- 1Y
- 45.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
WCBR vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund | 26.82% | -1.44% | 11.42% | 66.63% | -41.96% | 6.99% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 20.20% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 12.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCBR and XT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WCBR and XT has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WCBR vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WCBR
XT
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
WCBR
XT
Basic Materials
WCBR
-
XT
Communication Services
WCBR
-
XT
Consumer Cyclical
WCBR
-
XT
Consumer Defensive
WCBR
-
XT
Energy
WCBR
-
XT
Financial Services
WCBR
-
XT
Healthcare
WCBR
-
XT
Industrials
WCBR
-
XT
Real Estate
WCBR
-
XT
Utilities
WCBR
-
XT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCBR vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
WCBR
XT
WCBR vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCBR | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.48 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 4.41 | -3.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.99 | 18.51 | -17.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCBR | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 2.89 | -2.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.41 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.66 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
WCBR vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCBR | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.25% | -34.41% | -17.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.92% | -10.45% | -19.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.27% | -22.09% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.25% | -34.41% | -17.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -0.47% | -4.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.36% | -7.41% | -12.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.03% | 2.49% | +10.54% |
Volatility
WCBR vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) has a higher volatility of 13.55% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 4.85%. This indicates that WCBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCBR | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.55% | 4.85% | +8.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.26% | 11.94% | +15.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.16% | 15.99% | +16.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.60% | 20.76% | +12.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.59% | 20.08% | +13.51% |
WCBR vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCBR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCBR vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 6.61% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCBR and XT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WCBR has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to XT (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCBR dropped -52.25% vs XT's -34.41%.
On 5-year performance, WCBR leads with 9.81% vs 8.42% for XT. On fees, WCBR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, WCBR has performed better with a 9.81% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WCBR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.00% for WCBR.
WCBR tracks WisdomTree Team8 Cybersecurity Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCBR and 0.46% for XT.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WCBR and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer