PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCBR vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCBR vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCBR achieves a 26.82% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 8.62% return.


WCBR

1D
-3.87%
1M
30.04%
YTD
26.82%
6M
19.91%
1Y
12.83%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*

NTSX

1D
-1.05%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.62%
6M
7.83%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCBR vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
26.82%-1.44%11.42%66.63%-41.96%6.99%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
8.62%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.01%

Correlation

The correlation between WCBR and NTSX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021

0.62

The correlation between WCBR and NTSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WCBR vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WCBR
NTSX

Technology

100.0%
35.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Communication Services

-

12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.5%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

12.3%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

7.7%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Technology

WCBR
100.0%
NTSX
35.1%

Basic Materials

WCBR

-

NTSX
1.4%

Communication Services

WCBR

-

NTSX
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

WCBR

-

NTSX
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

WCBR

-

NTSX
5.5%

Energy

WCBR

-

NTSX
3.5%

Financial Services

WCBR

-

NTSX
12.3%

Healthcare

WCBR

-

NTSX
8.4%

Industrials

WCBR

-

NTSX
7.7%

Real Estate

WCBR

-

NTSX
1.5%

Utilities

WCBR

-

NTSX
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCBR vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCBR
WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCBR vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCBRNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.37

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

2.77

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.99

12.25

-11.27

WCBR vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCBR and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCBRNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

2.06

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.57

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.71

-0.50

Drawdowns

WCBR vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCBRNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.25%

-31.34%

-20.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.92%

-9.16%

-20.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.27%

-16.82%

-13.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.25%

-31.34%

-20.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.56%

-1.05%

-3.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.36%

-6.79%

-13.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.03%

2.07%

+10.96%

Volatility

WCBR vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) has a higher volatility of 13.55% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.39%. This indicates that WCBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCBRNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.55%

3.39%

+10.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.26%

9.58%

+17.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.16%

12.31%

+19.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.60%

17.04%

+16.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.59%

18.27%

+15.32%

WCBR vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCBR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCBR vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

WCBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.03%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCBR and NTSX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WCBR has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to NTSX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCBR dropped -52.25% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, WCBR leads with 9.81% vs 9.69% for NTSX. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, WCBR has performed better with a 9.81% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WCBR.

NTSX has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.00% for WCBR.

WCBR is categorized as Technology Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCBR and 0.20% for NTSX.

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCBR and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer