WCBR vs. GTEK

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

WCBR (WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund) and GTEK (Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. WCBR is passively managed, while GTEK is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WCBR returned 27.07%/yr vs 30.01%/yr for GTEK. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCBR charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GTEK.

Performance

WCBR vs. GTEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WCBR having a 45.22% return and GTEK slightly lower at 43.93%.

WCBR

• 1D: 6.08%
• 1M: 24.48%
• 6M: 44.92%
• YTD: 45.22%
• 1Y: 31.83%
• 3Y*: 27.07%
• 5Y*: 10.74%
• 10Y*: —

GTEK

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: -2.07%
• 6M: 37.67%
• YTD: 43.93%
• 1Y: 61.00%
• 3Y*: 30.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCBR vs. GTEK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	45.22%	-1.44%	11.42%	66.63%	-41.96%	-4.40%
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	43.93%	23.68%	15.94%	33.58%	-46.73%	-2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between WCBR and GTEK is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021	0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between WCBR and GTEK has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WCBR vs. GTEK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WCBR	GTEK
Technology	100.0%	74.5%
Basic Materials	-	3.4%
Communication Services	-	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.2%
Healthcare	-	1.1%
Industrials	-	8.1%
Real Estate	-	2.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WCBR vs. GTEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCBR

WCBR Risk / Return Rank: 29
WCBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
WCBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
WCBR Omega Ratio Rank: 32
WCBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
WCBR Martin Ratio Rank: 24

GTEK

GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 82
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 73
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCBR vs. GTEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WCBR	GTEK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	2.06	-1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	2.61	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.34	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	5.51	-4.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.41	16.03	-13.62

WCBR vs. GTEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the GTEK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCBR and GTEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WCBR vs. GTEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCBR drawdown since its inception was -52.25%, roughly equal to the maximum GTEK drawdown of -53.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCBR and GTEK.

Drawdown Indicators

	WCBR	GTEK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.25%	-53.77%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.92%	-11.13%	-18.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.27%	-27.49%	-2.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.53%	+8.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.09%	-26.98%	+6.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.22%	3.82%	+9.40%

Volatility

WCBR vs. GTEK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund (WCBR) is 10.81%, while Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) has a volatility of 11.82%. This indicates that WCBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WCBR	GTEK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.81%	11.82%	-1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.33%	26.11%	+3.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.89%	29.70%	+4.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.00%	28.82%	+5.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.70%	28.82%	+4.88%

WCBR vs. GTEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCBR has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GTEK's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

WCBR vs. GTEK - Dividend Comparison

Neither WCBR nor GTEK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.26%	0.03%	0.00%
WCBR WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.03%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WCBR and GTEK in my portfolio?

WCBR and GTEK have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WCBR or GTEK?

GTEK has higher volatility (11.82%) compared to WCBR (10.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCBR dropped -52.25% vs GTEK's -53.77%.

Which ETF is better, WCBR or GTEK?

On 3-year performance, GTEK leads with 30.01% vs 27.07% for WCBR. On fees, WCBR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, WCBR has been the lower-risk option at 10.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WCBR or GTEK?

Over the 3-year period, GTEK has performed better with a 30.01% return vs 27.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WCBR or GTEK?

WCBR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WCBR or GTEK?

WCBR and GTEK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WCBR and GTEK?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WCBR and 0.75% for GTEK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.