PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WBSIX vs. FECGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WBSIX vs. FECGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund (WBSIX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBSIX achieves a 19.52% return, which is significantly lower than FECGX's 22.18% return.


WBSIX

1D
0.25%
1M
6.39%
YTD
19.52%
6M
17.13%
1Y
32.93%
3Y*
21.13%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
15.39%

FECGX

1D
1.17%
1M
5.93%
YTD
22.18%
6M
18.79%
1Y
42.27%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBSIX vs. FECGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WBSIX
William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund
19.52%3.03%32.88%16.38%-21.46%12.64%38.87%1.68%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
22.18%13.04%15.26%18.90%-26.17%2.83%34.41%7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between WBSIX and FECGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.96

The correlation between WBSIX and FECGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WBSIX vs. FECGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBSIX
WBSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
WBSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
WBSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FECGX
FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBSIX vs. FECGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund (WBSIX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WBSIXFECGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.32

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.95

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.68

10.57

-0.89

WBSIX vs. FECGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the FECGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBSIX and FECGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WBSIX vs. FECGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBSIX drawdown since its inception was -62.35%, which is greater than FECGX's maximum drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBSIX and FECGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WBSIXFECGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.35%

-41.85%

-20.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-14.81%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-28.45%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.13%

-40.34%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.12%

-15.65%

+4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

4.13%

-0.60%

Volatility

WBSIX vs. FECGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund (WBSIX) is 6.86%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) has a volatility of 7.66%. This indicates that WBSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FECGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WBSIXFECGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

7.66%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.40%

16.76%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.77%

22.23%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.98%

24.70%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.09%

27.21%

-4.12%

WBSIX vs. FECGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBSIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FECGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

WBSIX vs. FECGX - Dividend Comparison

WBSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than FECGX's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.44%0.54%1.25%0.81%0.80%3.43%1.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WBSIX
William Blair Small Cap Growth Fund
6.26%7.49%20.14%1.53%3.55%17.85%9.73%2.07%12.60%16.89%5.42%8.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, WBSIX and FECGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FECGX has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to WBSIX (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBSIX dropped -62.35% vs FECGX's -41.85%.

FECGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WBSIX and FECGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer