WBIL vs. DIVD
WBIL (WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF) and DIVD (Altrius Global Dividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WBIL returned 11.97%/yr vs 17.04%/yr for DIVD. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WBIL charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for DIVD.
Performance
WBIL vs. DIVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WBIL achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly higher than DIVD's 11.28% return.
WBIL
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 14.80%
- 6M
- 12.99%
- 1Y
- 27.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.06%
DIVD
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 24.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WBIL vs. DIVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WBIL WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF | 14.80% | -0.47% | 13.29% | 11.79% | 1.53% |
DIVD Altrius Global Dividend ETF | 11.28% | 26.18% | 2.52% | 14.27% | 17.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between WBIL and DIVD is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022 | 0.58 |
The correlation between WBIL and DIVD shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WBIL vs. DIVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WBIL
DIVD
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
WBIL
DIVD
Industrials
WBIL
DIVD
Consumer Cyclical
WBIL
DIVD
Financial Services
WBIL
DIVD
Communication Services
WBIL
DIVD
Healthcare
WBIL
DIVD
Consumer Defensive
WBIL
DIVD
Real Estate
WBIL
DIVD
Basic Materials
WBIL
DIVD
Energy
WBIL
DIVD
Utilities
WBIL
DIVD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WBIL vs. DIVD — Risk / Return Rank
WBIL
DIVD
WBIL vs. DIVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) and Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WBIL | DIVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.38 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 3.63 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.74 | 13.28 | -1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WBIL vs. DIVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBIL drawdown since its inception was -25.30%, which is greater than DIVD's maximum drawdown of -13.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIL and DIVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBIL | DIVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.30% | -13.88% | -11.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.85% | -6.70% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.30% | -13.88% | -11.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -2.02% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -2.21% | -4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 1.83% | +0.51% |
Volatility
WBIL vs. DIVD - Volatility Comparison
WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF (WBIL) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD) at 2.75%. This indicates that WBIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WBIL | DIVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 2.75% | +4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.97% | 8.28% | +3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.34% | 11.40% | +3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.87% | 13.25% | +0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 13.25% | -0.47% |
WBIL vs. DIVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBIL has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVD's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
WBIL vs. DIVD - Dividend Comparison
WBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than DIVD's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVD Altrius Global Dividend ETF | 2.72% | 2.86% | 3.39% | 2.96% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WBIL WBI BullBear Quality 3000 ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.29% | 1.03% | 2.02% | 0.19% | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.83% | 0.58% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WBIL and DIVD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WBIL has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to DIVD (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBIL dropped -25.30% vs DIVD's -13.88%.
On 3-year performance, DIVD leads with 17.04% vs 11.97% for WBIL. On fees, DIVD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DIVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DIVD has performed better with a 17.04% return vs 11.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for WBIL.
DIVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.04% for WBIL.
They also come from different issuers: WBI and Altrius. Their fees differ too: 1.23% for WBIL and 0.49% for DIVD.
DIVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WBIL and DIVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer