PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WBIIX vs. RWIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WBIIX vs. RWIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund (WBIIX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBIIX achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than RWIIX's 7.94% return.


WBIIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-4.22%
6M
5.03%
YTD
10.58%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
11.45%
5Y*
1.81%
10Y*
8.14%
ALL TIME*
7.95%

RWIIX

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.82%
6M
3.63%
YTD
7.94%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WBIIX vs. RWIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WBIIX
William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund
10.58%18.16%2.40%15.23%-28.39%9.30%32.69%30.75%-17.49%0.84%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
7.94%7.87%-6.03%9.07%-11.57%10.68%14.57%4.58%-2.46%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between WBIIX and RWIIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2017

0.58

The correlation between WBIIX and RWIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.70 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WBIIX vs. RWIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WBIIX
WBIIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
WBIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WBIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
WBIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
WBIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
WBIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

RWIIX
RWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WBIIX vs. RWIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund (WBIIX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WBIIXRWIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

2.64

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.62

6.40

-1.78

WBIIX vs. RWIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the RWIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBIIX and RWIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WBIIX vs. RWIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBIIX drawdown since its inception was -65.13%, which is greater than RWIIX's maximum drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIIX and RWIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WBIIXRWIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.13%

-20.34%

-44.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.17%

-6.94%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.06%

-20.34%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.91%

-20.34%

-20.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.75%

-1.96%

-4.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.72%

-7.73%

-6.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

2.86%

+1.05%

Volatility

WBIIX vs. RWIIX - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund (WBIIX) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) at 3.06%. This indicates that WBIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WBIIXRWIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

3.06%

+2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.72%

9.42%

+6.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.71%

11.63%

+6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.14%

11.70%

+5.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

10.98%

+6.20%

WBIIX vs. RWIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBIIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than RWIIX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

WBIIX vs. RWIIX - Dividend Comparison

WBIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.33%, more than RWIIX's 8.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
8.09%8.74%0.00%6.82%1.72%14.15%6.51%1.84%0.86%0.02%0.00%0.00%
WBIIX
William Blair Institutional International Growth Fund
11.33%12.53%7.49%2.51%6.57%16.58%12.61%0.95%11.74%4.16%1.15%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


WBIIX and RWIIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WBIIX has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to RWIIX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBIIX dropped -65.13% vs RWIIX's -20.34%.

RWIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WBIIX and RWIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer