WBIG vs. AVTM
WBIG (WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF) and AVTM (Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WBIG charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for AVTM.
Performance
WBIG vs. AVTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WBIG
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- 8.66%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 19.57%
- 3Y*
- 6.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.82%
AVTM
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WBIG vs. AVTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WBIG WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | 5.66% |
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 9.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between WBIG and AVTM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WBIG vs. AVTM — Risk / Return Rank
WBIG
AVTM
WBIG vs. AVTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG) and Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WBIG | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.22 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WBIG | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 1.88 | -1.74 |
Drawdowns
WBIG vs. AVTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WBIG drawdown since its inception was -25.32%, which is greater than AVTM's maximum drawdown of -9.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBIG and AVTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WBIG | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.32% | -9.21% | -16.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.84% | -0.65% | -4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -2.08% | -8.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | — | — |
Volatility
WBIG vs. AVTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WBIG | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.89% | 15.88% | -5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.05% | 15.88% | -3.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 15.88% | -4.33% |
WBIG vs. AVTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WBIG has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than AVTM's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
WBIG vs. AVTM - Dividend Comparison
WBIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than AVTM's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WBIG WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | 1.21% | 1.74% | 2.05% | 1.74% | 1.29% | 2.94% | 0.90% | 1.87% | 1.20% | 1.27% | 0.96% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WBIG and AVTM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVTM is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVTM is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for WBIG.
WBIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.08% for AVTM.
They also come from different issuers: WBI and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for WBIG and 0.22% for AVTM.
Find the right allocation for WBIG and AVTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer