WBELX vs. CEMFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WBELX (William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund) and CEMFX (Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, WBELX returned 8.20%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for CEMFX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WBELX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for CEMFX.

Performance

WBELX vs. CEMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund (WBELX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBELX achieves a 17.95% return, which is significantly lower than CEMFX's 28.49% return. Over the past 10 years, WBELX has underperformed CEMFX with an annualized return of 8.20%, while CEMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.50% annualized return.

WBELX

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 6.71%
• YTD: 17.95%
• 6M: 19.33%
• 1Y: 38.22%
• 3Y*: 17.61%
• 5Y*: 2.02%
• 10Y*: 8.20%

CEMFX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 5.80%
• YTD: 28.49%
• 6M: 30.35%
• 1Y: 56.51%
• 3Y*: 28.78%
• 5Y*: 13.51%
• 10Y*: 11.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBELX vs. CEMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WBELX William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund	17.95%	26.44%	5.86%	6.14%	-25.85%	-7.51%	27.53%	28.37%	-17.41%	41.89%
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund	28.49%	31.39%	9.51%	26.45%	-16.15%	6.74%	8.70%	19.75%	-16.90%	29.82%

Correlation

The correlation between WBELX and CEMFX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.84

The correlation between WBELX and CEMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WBELX vs. CEMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBELX

WBELX Risk / Return Rank: 52
WBELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
WBELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
WBELX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
WBELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
WBELX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

CEMFX

CEMFX Risk / Return Rank: 92
CEMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CEMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CEMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CEMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CEMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBELX vs. CEMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund (WBELX) and Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WBELX	CEMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	3.62	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	4.70	-1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.68	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	4.68	-1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.84	16.81	-6.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WBELX vs. CEMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBELX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the CEMFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBELX and CEMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WBELX	CEMFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18	3.62	-1.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.94	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.76	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.55	-0.36

Drawdowns

WBELX vs. CEMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBELX drawdown since its inception was -64.98%, which is greater than CEMFX's maximum drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBELX and CEMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WBELX	CEMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.98%	-39.30%	-25.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.72%	-12.41%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.98%	-13.27%	-3.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.63%	-28.13%	-11.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.26%	-39.30%	-5.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.38%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.78%	-9.60%	-9.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.01%	3.45%	+0.56%

Volatility

WBELX vs. CEMFX - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund (WBELX) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund (CEMFX) at 6.15%. This indicates that WBELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WBELX	CEMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.08%	6.15%	+0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.89%	13.35%	+1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.15%	16.05%	+2.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.72%	14.47%	+2.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.53%	15.12%	+2.41%

WBELX vs. CEMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBELX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

WBELX vs. CEMFX - Dividend Comparison

WBELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than CEMFX's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEMFX Cullen Emerging Markets High Dividend Fund	1.69%	1.72%	3.31%	4.68%	1.26%	2.62%	2.13%	4.16%	2.26%	3.59%	3.65%	4.60%
WBELX William Blair Emerging Markets Leaders Fund	0.75%	0.88%	0.25%	0.78%	0.99%	8.25%	1.00%	0.88%	10.92%	0.67%	0.13%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WBELX and CEMFX in my portfolio?

WBELX and CEMFX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WBELX or CEMFX?

WBELX has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to CEMFX (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBELX dropped -64.98% vs CEMFX's -39.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.