WBCIX vs. WGFIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WBCIX (William Blair Small-Mid Cap Core Fund) and WGFIX (William Blair Global Leaders Fund) are both mutual funds - WBCIX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by William Blair, while WGFIX is a Global Equities fund managed by William Blair. Over the past 5 years, WBCIX returned 5.31%/yr vs 5.02%/yr for WGFIX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WBCIX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for WGFIX.

Performance

WBCIX vs. WGFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Small-Mid Cap Core Fund (WBCIX) and William Blair Global Leaders Fund (WGFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WBCIX achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than WGFIX's 8.46% return.

WBCIX

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 5.78%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 12.52%
• 1Y: 21.24%
• 3Y*: 11.47%
• 5Y*: 5.31%
• 10Y*: —

WGFIX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 6.85%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 6M: 10.12%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 12.92%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 11.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WBCIX vs. WGFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
WBCIX William Blair Small-Mid Cap Core Fund	12.39%	1.29%	12.04%	13.26%	-17.11%	26.63%	20.60%	10.29%
WGFIX William Blair Global Leaders Fund	8.46%	16.06%	7.52%	23.02%	-29.32%	16.71%	32.06%	13.56%

Correlation

The correlation between WBCIX and WGFIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2019	0.78

The correlation between WBCIX and WGFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WBCIX vs. WGFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBCIX

WBCIX Risk / Return Rank: 26
WBCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
WBCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
WBCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
WBCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
WBCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

WGFIX

WGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 25
WGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
WGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
WGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
WGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
WGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WBCIX vs. WGFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Small-Mid Cap Core Fund (WBCIX) and William Blair Global Leaders Fund (WGFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WBCIX	WGFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.51	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	2.12	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.27	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	1.55	+0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.21	6.14	+1.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WBCIX vs. WGFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WBCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the WGFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WBCIX and WGFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WBCIX	WGFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	1.51	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.27	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.36	+0.11

Drawdowns

WBCIX vs. WGFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WBCIX drawdown since its inception was -39.56%, smaller than the maximum WGFIX drawdown of -59.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WBCIX and WGFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WBCIX	WGFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.56%	-59.51%	+19.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.06%	-13.11%	+2.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.53%	-18.90%	-4.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.65%	-38.76%	+11.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.42%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.14%	-11.87%	+2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	3.28%	-0.13%

Volatility

WBCIX vs. WGFIX - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Small-Mid Cap Core Fund (WBCIX) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to William Blair Global Leaders Fund (WGFIX) at 3.84%. This indicates that WBCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WGFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WBCIX	WGFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	3.84%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.55%	10.76%	+1.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.87%	13.43%	+3.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.70%	18.74%	+1.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.82%	18.86%	+4.96%

WBCIX vs. WGFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WBCIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than WGFIX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

WBCIX vs. WGFIX - Dividend Comparison

WBCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than WGFIX's 78.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WBCIX William Blair Small-Mid Cap Core Fund	2.66%	2.98%	1.35%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WGFIX William Blair Global Leaders Fund	78.86%	85.53%	54.25%	6.65%	2.17%	5.65%	12.57%	1.35%	17.62%	4.24%	0.72%	5.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WBCIX and WGFIX in my portfolio?

WBCIX and WGFIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WBCIX or WGFIX?

WBCIX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to WGFIX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WBCIX dropped -39.56% vs WGFIX's -59.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WGFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.