PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WATL.L vs. SP5L.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WATL.L is traded in GBp, while SP5L.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SP5L.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WATL.L achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than SP5L.L's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, WATL.L has underperformed SP5L.L with an annualized return of 9.56%, while SP5L.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.61% annualized return.


WATL.L

1D
1.35%
1M
4.84%
YTD
5.12%
6M
5.27%
1Y
6.96%
3Y*
9.69%
5Y*
6.86%
10Y*
9.56%

SP5L.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
9.53%
6M
9.69%
1Y
26.05%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
14.16%
10Y*
13.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WATL.L
Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist
5.12%6.48%7.33%16.26%-11.97%25.45%13.28%32.02%-12.68%14.47%
SP5L.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc
9.53%9.50%27.60%19.99%-8.84%31.19%13.92%26.93%1.00%-5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between WATL.L and SP5L.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between WATL.L and SP5L.L has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WATL.L
SP5L.L

Industrials

75.1%
7.8%

Utilities

23.5%
2.1%

Technology

1.4%
39.0%

Basic Materials

0.6%
1.7%

Communication Services

0.0%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
9.9%

Financial Services

0.0%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
4.5%

Energy

0.0%
3.1%

Healthcare

0.0%
8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Industrials

WATL.L
75.1%
SP5L.L
7.8%

Utilities

WATL.L
23.5%
SP5L.L
2.1%

Technology

WATL.L
1.4%
SP5L.L
39.0%

Basic Materials

WATL.L
0.6%
SP5L.L
1.7%

Communication Services

WATL.L
0.0%
SP5L.L
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

WATL.L
0.0%
SP5L.L
9.9%

Financial Services

WATL.L
0.0%
SP5L.L
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

WATL.L
0.0%
SP5L.L
4.5%

Energy

WATL.L
0.0%
SP5L.L
3.1%

Healthcare

WATL.L
0.0%
SP5L.L
8.3%

Real Estate

WATL.L

-

SP5L.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WATL.L vs. SP5L.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WATL.L
WATL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
WATL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WATL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
WATL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
WATL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
WATL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SP5L.L
SP5L.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SP5L.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WATL.LSP5L.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.44

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

3.60

-3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.42

12.74

-11.32

WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WATL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the SP5L.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WATL.L and SP5L.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WATL.L drawdown since its inception was -47.32%, which is greater than SP5L.L's maximum drawdown of -25.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WATL.L and SP5L.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WATL.LSP5L.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.32%

-25.47%

-21.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-7.20%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-21.12%

+7.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.48%

-21.12%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.96%

-25.47%

-3.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.86%

-1.54%

-3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-5.16%

-3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

2.04%

+2.85%

Volatility

WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WATL.LSP5L.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.75%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

7.80%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

10.97%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

18.80%

-4.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.92%

17.97%

-3.05%

WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WATL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SP5L.L's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Dividend Comparison

WATL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while SP5L.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SP5L.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WATL.L
Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist
1.03%1.08%0.76%0.85%0.42%0.63%1.22%1.59%2.06%1.60%2.22%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


WATL.L and SP5L.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SP5L.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SP5L.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for WATL.L.

WATL.L is categorized as Water Equities, while SP5L.L is S&P 500. WATL.L tracks S&P Global Water TR, while SP5L.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for WATL.L and 0.07% for SP5L.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WATL.L and SP5L.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer