WATL.L vs. SP5L.L
WATL.L (Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist) and SP5L.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - WATL.L is a Water Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Water TR, while SP5L.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WATL.L returned 9.56%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for SP5L.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WATL.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SP5L.L.
Performance
WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WATL.L is traded in GBp, while SP5L.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SP5L.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WATL.L achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than SP5L.L's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, WATL.L has underperformed SP5L.L with an annualized return of 9.56%, while SP5L.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.61% annualized return.
WATL.L
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 5.27%
- 1Y
- 6.96%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
SP5L.L
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 26.05%
- 3Y*
- 19.28%
- 5Y*
- 14.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WATL.L Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist | 5.12% | 6.48% | 7.33% | 16.26% | -11.97% | 25.45% | 13.28% | 32.02% | -12.68% | 14.47% |
SP5L.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc | 9.53% | 9.50% | 27.60% | 19.99% | -8.84% | 31.19% | 13.92% | 26.93% | 1.00% | -5.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between WATL.L and SP5L.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WATL.L and SP5L.L has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WATL.L
SP5L.L
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Industrials
WATL.L
SP5L.L
Utilities
WATL.L
SP5L.L
Technology
WATL.L
SP5L.L
Basic Materials
WATL.L
SP5L.L
Communication Services
WATL.L
SP5L.L
Consumer Cyclical
WATL.L
SP5L.L
Financial Services
WATL.L
SP5L.L
Consumer Defensive
WATL.L
SP5L.L
Energy
WATL.L
SP5L.L
Healthcare
WATL.L
SP5L.L
Real Estate
WATL.L
-
SP5L.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WATL.L vs. SP5L.L — Risk / Return Rank
WATL.L
SP5L.L
WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WATL.L | SP5L.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.44 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 3.60 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.42 | 12.74 | -11.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WATL.L drawdown since its inception was -47.32%, which is greater than SP5L.L's maximum drawdown of -25.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WATL.L and SP5L.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WATL.L | SP5L.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.32% | -25.47% | -21.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.59% | -7.20% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -21.12% | +7.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.48% | -21.12% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.96% | -25.47% | -3.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.86% | -1.54% | -3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.61% | -5.16% | -3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 2.04% | +2.85% |
Volatility
WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist (WATL.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WATL.L | SP5L.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 3.75% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 7.80% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 10.97% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 18.80% | -4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 17.97% | -3.05% |
WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WATL.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SP5L.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
WATL.L vs. SP5L.L - Dividend Comparison
WATL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while SP5L.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SP5L.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WATL.L Lyxor MSCI Water ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF Dist | 1.03% | 1.08% | 0.76% | 0.85% | 0.42% | 0.63% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 2.06% | 1.60% | 2.22% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WATL.L and SP5L.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SP5L.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SP5L.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for WATL.L.
WATL.L is categorized as Water Equities, while SP5L.L is S&P 500. WATL.L tracks S&P Global Water TR, while SP5L.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for WATL.L and 0.07% for SP5L.L.
Find the right allocation for WATL.L and SP5L.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer