PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WATFX vs. IUSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WATFX vs. IUSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Core Bond Fund (WATFX) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WATFX achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than IUSB's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, WATFX has underperformed IUSB with an annualized return of 1.54%, while IUSB has yielded a comparatively higher 1.94% annualized return.


WATFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.50%
YTD
0.02%
6M
0.02%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
-0.89%
10Y*
1.54%

IUSB

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.31%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
0.44%
10Y*
1.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WATFX vs. IUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WATFX
Western Asset Core Bond Fund
0.02%8.01%0.44%5.52%-17.32%-2.13%9.12%10.44%-0.62%5.21%
IUSB
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
0.43%7.38%2.11%6.23%-13.04%-1.33%7.62%9.13%-0.27%3.82%

Correlation

The correlation between WATFX and IUSB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014

0.85

The correlation between WATFX and IUSB shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WATFX vs. IUSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WATFX
WATFX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
WATFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WATFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
WATFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
WATFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
WATFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSB
IUSB Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WATFX vs. IUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Core Bond Fund (WATFX) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WATFXIUSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.20

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.47

6.68

-1.22

WATFX vs. IUSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WATFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the IUSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WATFX and IUSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WATFXIUSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.54

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.08

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.39

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.46

+0.10

Drawdowns

WATFX vs. IUSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WATFX drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, which is greater than IUSB's maximum drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WATFX and IUSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WATFXIUSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.69%

-17.90%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-2.53%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.35%

-5.82%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.26%

-17.87%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.69%

-17.90%

-5.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.35%

-1.33%

-6.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-3.59%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

0.83%

+0.19%

Volatility

WATFX vs. IUSB - Volatility Comparison

Western Asset Core Bond Fund (WATFX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) at 1.24%. This indicates that WATFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WATFXIUSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

1.24%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

2.62%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.13%

3.62%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.83%

5.79%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.53%

5.04%

+0.49%

WATFX vs. IUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

WATFX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSB's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

WATFX vs. IUSB - Dividend Comparison

WATFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than IUSB's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSB
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
4.23%4.17%4.04%3.46%2.53%1.74%2.68%3.04%2.98%2.56%2.60%1.95%
WATFX
Western Asset Core Bond Fund
3.93%4.15%4.48%3.35%2.39%2.05%3.90%3.62%2.92%2.34%2.51%2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, WATFX and IUSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WATFX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to IUSB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WATFX dropped -23.69% vs IUSB's -17.90%.

IUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WATFX and IUSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer