WAMFX vs. FAMEX
WAMFX (Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund) and FAMEX (FAM Dividend Focus Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WAMFX returned 10.39%/yr vs 10.47%/yr for FAMEX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WAMFX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for FAMEX.
Performance
WAMFX vs. FAMEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAMFX achieves a 5.88% return, which is significantly higher than FAMEX's 3.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WAMFX having a 10.39% annualized return and FAMEX not far ahead at 10.47%.
WAMFX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 5.88%
- 1Y
- 8.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
FAMEX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- 6M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- -2.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
WAMFX vs. FAMEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAMFX Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund | 5.88% | 4.82% | 10.39% | 13.90% | -10.87% | 24.85% | 9.56% | 36.98% | -3.59% | 16.21% |
FAMEX FAM Dividend Focus Fund | 3.03% | 1.91% | 7.56% | 19.70% | -13.40% | 25.61% | 13.19% | 32.56% | 0.06% | 12.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAMFX and FAMEX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2011 | 0.92 |
The correlation between WAMFX and FAMEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAMFX vs. FAMEX — Risk / Return Rank
WAMFX
FAMEX
WAMFX vs. FAMEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund (WAMFX) and FAM Dividend Focus Fund (FAMEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WAMFX | FAMEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.98 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | -0.19 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.46 | -0.39 | +2.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WAMFX vs. FAMEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAMFX drawdown since its inception was -36.81%, smaller than the maximum FAMEX drawdown of -54.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMFX and FAMEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAMFX | FAMEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.81% | -54.68% | +17.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -13.83% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.51% | -15.36% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.82% | -24.10% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.81% | -35.96% | -0.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -5.18% | +4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -6.80% | +2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 6.84% | -3.92% |
Volatility
WAMFX vs. FAMEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund (WAMFX) is 3.33%, while FAM Dividend Focus Fund (FAMEX) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that WAMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAMEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAMFX | FAMEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 4.48% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 10.63% | -2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.94% | 13.58% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 16.74% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 17.91% | -0.51% |
WAMFX vs. FAMEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAMFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FAMEX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAMFX vs. FAMEX - Dividend Comparison
WAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than FAMEX's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMEX FAM Dividend Focus Fund | 3.64% | 3.74% | 3.34% | 0.67% | 1.36% | 1.36% | 2.18% | 2.97% | 1.35% | 0.70% | 8.80% | 5.19% |
WAMFX Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund | 6.83% | 7.23% | 3.49% | 4.84% | 5.55% | 4.82% | 3.87% | 12.83% | 7.08% | 0.45% | 5.06% | 5.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WAMFX and FAMEX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAMEX has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to WAMFX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAMFX dropped -36.81% vs FAMEX's -54.68%.
WAMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WAMFX and FAMEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer