WAMFX vs. ATGAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

WAMFX (Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WAMFX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.

Performance

WAMFX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund (WAMFX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WAMFX

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 2.31%
• 6M: 5.68%
• YTD: 8.46%
• 1Y: 11.45%
• 3Y*: 9.04%
• 5Y*: 6.78%
• 10Y*: 10.66%
• ALL TIME*: 10.81%

ATGAX

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
WAMFX Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

WAMFX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WAMFX Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund	7.22%
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund	2.64%

Correlation

The correlation between WAMFX and ATGAX is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.30

Return for Risk

WAMFX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WAMFX

WAMFX Risk / Return Rank: 22
WAMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
WAMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
WAMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
WAMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
WAMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

ATGAX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WAMFX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund (WAMFX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WAMFX	ATGAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.33	—	—

Drawdowns

WAMFX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMFX drawdown since its inception was -36.81%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of -3.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMFX and ATGAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAMFX	ATGAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.81%	-3.70%	-33.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	-0.89%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-1.10%	-2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WAMFX	ATGAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.90%	16.42%	-4.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.81%	16.42%	-0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.42%	16.42%	+1.00%

WAMFX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAMFX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison

WAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WAMFX Boston Trust Walden Midcap Fund	6.66%	7.23%	3.49%	4.84%	5.55%	4.82%	3.87%	12.83%	7.08%	0.45%	5.06%	5.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAMFX and ATGAX in my portfolio?

WAMFX and ATGAX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.