WAMCX vs. DMCRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WAMCX (Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund) and DMCRX (Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WAMCX returned 12.88%/yr vs 23.16%/yr for DMCRX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WAMCX charges 1.16%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for DMCRX.

Performance

WAMCX vs. DMCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAMCX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than DMCRX's 29.20% return. Over the past 10 years, WAMCX has underperformed DMCRX with an annualized return of 12.88%, while DMCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.16% annualized return.

WAMCX

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 6.09%
• YTD: 9.53%
• 6M: 6.78%
• 1Y: 20.07%
• 3Y*: 7.90%
• 5Y*: -4.66%
• 10Y*: 12.88%

DMCRX

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: 5.02%
• YTD: 29.20%
• 6M: 25.97%
• 1Y: 81.98%
• 3Y*: 31.47%
• 5Y*: 10.91%
• 10Y*: 23.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAMCX vs. DMCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WAMCX Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund	9.53%	-2.85%	8.25%	19.19%	-39.71%	5.23%	71.48%	38.09%	10.34%	31.60%
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund	29.20%	31.17%	30.58%	11.47%	-33.54%	22.23%	86.43%	34.03%	2.52%	24.35%

Correlation

The correlation between WAMCX and DMCRX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013	0.89

The correlation between WAMCX and DMCRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WAMCX vs. DMCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAMCX

WAMCX Risk / Return Rank: 14
WAMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
WAMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
WAMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
WAMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
WAMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

DMCRX

DMCRX Risk / Return Rank: 85
DMCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DMCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DMCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
DMCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
DMCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAMCX vs. DMCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WAMCX	DMCRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	2.84	-1.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	3.29	-1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.43	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	5.44	-4.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.10	18.89	-14.79

WAMCX vs. DMCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the DMCRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAMCX and DMCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WAMCX vs. DMCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAMCX drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, which is greater than DMCRX's maximum drawdown of -46.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAMCX and DMCRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAMCX	DMCRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.51%	-46.68%	-19.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.89%	-15.46%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.21%	-34.92%	+1.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.18%	-46.68%	-6.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.18%	-46.68%	-6.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.40%	0.00%	-26.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.17%	-14.80%	-0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.11%	4.44%	+0.67%

Volatility

WAMCX vs. DMCRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) is 6.89%, while Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that WAMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WAMCX	DMCRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.89%	10.43%	-3.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.58%	22.58%	-6.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.92%	29.71%	-7.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.50%	28.65%	-1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.68%	28.05%	-2.37%

WAMCX vs. DMCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAMCX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than DMCRX's 1.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAMCX vs. DMCRX - Dividend Comparison

WAMCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund	10.62%	13.72%	3.86%	0.87%	8.20%	48.23%	19.79%	14.70%	33.22%	8.91%	0.00%	4.20%
WAMCX Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	12.08%	2.99%	1.96%	7.65%	11.92%	11.44%	9.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAMCX and DMCRX in my portfolio?

WAMCX and DMCRX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WAMCX or DMCRX?

DMCRX has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to WAMCX (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAMCX dropped -66.51% vs DMCRX's -46.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DMCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.