WAIGX vs. WAFMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Wasatch International Growth Fund (WAIGX) and Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX).
WAIGX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Jun 27, 2002. WAFMX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Jan 30, 2012.
Performance
WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAIGX Wasatch International Growth Fund | -10.44% | 11.89% | -0.62% | 11.64% | -36.64% | 10.86% | 24.65% | 29.43% | -15.86% | 33.04% |
WAFMX Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund | -5.83% | 4.35% | 10.67% | 28.16% | -41.11% | 8.60% | 28.24% | 26.47% | -18.49% | 21.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAIGX achieves a -10.44% return, which is significantly lower than WAFMX's -5.83% return. Over the past 10 years, WAIGX has outperformed WAFMX with an annualized return of 2.96%, while WAFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.65% annualized return.
WAIGX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -10.98%
- YTD
- -10.44%
- 6M
- -13.51%
- 1Y
- 1.15%
- 3Y*
- 1.58%
- 5Y*
- -4.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.96%
WAFMX
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -10.79%
- YTD
- -5.83%
- 6M
- -10.08%
- 1Y
- -2.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.35%
- 5Y*
- -2.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAIGX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is lower than WAFMX's 2.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WAIGX vs. WAFMX — Risk / Return Rank
WAIGX
WAFMX
WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch International Growth Fund (WAIGX) and Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WAIGX | WAFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | -0.19 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.11 | -0.16 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.98 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | -0.35 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | -0.97 | +0.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WAIGX | WAFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | -0.19 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | -0.15 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.16 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.28 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between WAIGX and WAFMX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Dividend Comparison
WAIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 60.05%, while WAFMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAIGX Wasatch International Growth Fund | 60.05% | 53.78% | 20.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.13% | 10.93% | 2.50% | 17.84% | 2.71% | 4.01% | 0.00% |
WAFMX Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
Drawdowns
WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAIGX drawdown since its inception was -67.66%, which is greater than WAFMX's maximum drawdown of -49.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAIGX and WAFMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAIGX | WAFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.66% | -49.51% | -18.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.68% | -12.85% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.06% | -49.51% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.06% | -49.51% | +1.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.17% | -26.32% | -7.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.25% | -16.75% | +2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.75% | 4.63% | +2.12% |
Volatility
WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wasatch International Growth Fund (WAIGX) is 5.94%, while Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that WAIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAFMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WAIGX | WAFMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 7.30% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 10.96% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 15.16% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 17.51% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 16.73% | +1.35% |