PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAIGX vs. WAFMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch International Growth Fund (WAIGX) and Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAIGX achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than WAFMX's 3.06% return. Over the past 10 years, WAIGX has outperformed WAFMX with an annualized return of 4.67%, while WAFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.50% annualized return.


WAIGX

1D
0.93%
1M
6.21%
YTD
10.24%
6M
11.93%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
-1.33%
10Y*
4.67%

WAFMX

1D
1.64%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
3.06%
6M
1.92%
1Y
-1.85%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
-1.64%
10Y*
3.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WAIGX
Wasatch International Growth Fund
10.24%11.89%-0.62%11.64%-36.64%10.86%24.65%29.43%-15.86%33.04%
WAFMX
Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund
3.06%4.35%10.67%28.16%-41.11%8.60%28.24%26.47%-18.49%21.16%

Correlation

The correlation between WAIGX and WAFMX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2012

0.61

The correlation between WAIGX and WAFMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAIGX vs. WAFMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAIGX
WAIGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
WAIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
WAIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

WAFMX
WAFMX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
WAFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
WAFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch International Growth Fund (WAIGX) and Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WAIGXWAFMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.99

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

-0.12

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

-0.32

+1.14

WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAIGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the WAFMX Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAIGX and WAFMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WAIGXWAFMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

-0.11

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

-0.09

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.21

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.32

+0.14

Drawdowns

WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAIGX drawdown since its inception was -67.66%, which is greater than WAFMX's maximum drawdown of -49.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAIGX and WAFMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAIGXWAFMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.66%

-49.51%

-18.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.68%

-12.85%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.49%

-15.26%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.06%

-49.51%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.06%

-49.51%

+1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.97%

-19.37%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.32%

-16.79%

+2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.18%

5.02%

+2.16%

Volatility

WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch International Growth Fund (WAIGX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund (WAFMX) at 3.85%. This indicates that WAIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAFMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAIGXWAFMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

3.85%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

11.95%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

14.61%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.82%

17.58%

+1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

16.87%

+1.35%

WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAIGX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is lower than WAFMX's 2.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAIGX vs. WAFMX - Dividend Comparison

WAIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.78%, while WAFMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WAFMX
Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund
0.00%0.00%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%
WAIGX
Wasatch International Growth Fund
48.78%53.78%20.59%0.00%0.00%10.13%10.93%2.50%17.84%2.71%4.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAIGX and WAFMX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WAIGX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to WAFMX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAIGX dropped -67.66% vs WAFMX's -49.51%.

WAIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAIGX and WAFMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer