PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAGSX vs. GQFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WAGSX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Global Select Fund (WAGSX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WAGSX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WAGSX
Wasatch Global Select Fund
-8.14%1.74%0.50%27.77%-33.10%2.78%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
10.08%19.29%4.81%15.09%-1.13%5.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAGSX achieves a -8.14% return, which is significantly lower than GQFPX's 10.08% return.


WAGSX

1D
3.20%
1M
-6.62%
YTD
-8.14%
6M
-9.69%
1Y
-5.29%
3Y*
3.04%
5Y*
-2.05%
10Y*

GQFPX

1D
0.37%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
10.08%
6M
11.45%
1Y
19.15%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WAGSX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAGSX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WAGSX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAGSX
WAGSX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
WAGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
WAGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

GQFPX
GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAGSX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Global Select Fund (WAGSX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WAGSXGQFPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.29

1.58

-1.87

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.31

2.03

-2.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.33

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

1.96

-2.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.87

9.35

-10.22

WAGSX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAGSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAGSX and GQFPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WAGSXGQFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

1.58

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.87

-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between WAGSX and GQFPX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

WAGSX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

WAGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GQFPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
WAGSX
Wasatch Global Select Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%12.65%0.16%
GQFPX
GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund
4.83%5.32%3.71%3.69%5.18%1.38%0.00%

Drawdowns

WAGSX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAGSX drawdown since its inception was -43.62%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAGSX and GQFPX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WAGSXGQFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.62%

-16.95%

-26.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.76%

-9.37%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.80%

-2.80%

-23.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.70%

-3.03%

-14.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.55%

2.08%

+4.47%

Volatility

WAGSX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Global Select Fund (WAGSX) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.97%. This indicates that WAGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WAGSXGQFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

3.97%

+2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

6.99%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.59%

12.37%

+5.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.51%

12.88%

+6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.18%

12.88%

+8.30%