WAGSX vs. GAOAX
WAGSX (Wasatch Global Select Fund) and GAOAX (JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, WAGSX returned -1.67%/yr vs 2.86%/yr for GAOAX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WAGSX charges 1.35%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for GAOAX.
Performance
WAGSX vs. GAOAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WAGSX achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than GAOAX's 4.89% return.
WAGSX
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- -5.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.82%
- 5Y*
- -1.67%
- 10Y*
- —
GAOAX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 14.70%
- 3Y*
- 11.67%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 6.41%
WAGSX vs. GAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WAGSX Wasatch Global Select Fund | 1.14% | 1.74% | 0.50% | 27.77% | -33.10% | 7.95% | 34.68% | 9.40% |
GAOAX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A | 4.89% | 14.68% | 7.91% | 12.69% | -18.74% | 3.60% | 15.29% | 6.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAGSX and GAOAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between WAGSX and GAOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAGSX vs. GAOAX — Risk / Return Rank
WAGSX
GAOAX
WAGSX vs. GAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Global Select Fund (WAGSX) and JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WAGSX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.27 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 1.62 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 6.47 | -7.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WAGSX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 1.50 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.26 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.60 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
WAGSX vs. GAOAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAGSX drawdown since its inception was -43.62%, which is greater than GAOAX's maximum drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAGSX and GAOAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAGSX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.62% | -29.02% | -14.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.76% | -8.95% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.11% | -10.87% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.62% | -29.02% | -14.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.30% | -0.55% | -17.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -5.96% | -11.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.34% | 2.24% | +5.10% |
Volatility
WAGSX vs. GAOAX - Volatility Comparison
Wasatch Global Select Fund (WAGSX) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX) at 2.93%. This indicates that WAGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAGSX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.99% | 2.93% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.09% | 7.99% | +4.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.98% | 9.73% | +5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 11.10% | +8.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 10.87% | +10.24% |
WAGSX vs. GAOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAGSX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GAOAX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAGSX vs. GAOAX - Dividend Comparison
WAGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GAOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAOAX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A | 9.20% | 10.15% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 4.62% | 4.61% | 1.54% | 2.43% | 2.52% | 2.95% | 2.59% | 0.96% |
WAGSX Wasatch Global Select Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.65% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WAGSX and GAOAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WAGSX has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to GAOAX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAGSX dropped -43.62% vs GAOAX's -29.02%.
GAOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WAGSX and GAOAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer