WAGN vs. IWO
WAGN (Pabrai Wagons ETF) and IWO (iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WAGN is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Pabrai, while IWO is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth Index. WAGN is actively managed, while IWO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. WAGN charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for IWO.
Performance
WAGN vs. IWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WAGN
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
IWO
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- YTD
- 18.31%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.00%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.01%
WAGN vs. IWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF | 0.36% |
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | -2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between WAGN and IWO is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2026 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WAGN vs. IWO — Risk / Return Rank
WAGN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IWO
WAGN vs. IWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WAGN | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WAGN vs. IWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WAGN drawdown since its inception was -1.36%, smaller than the maximum IWO drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAGN and IWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WAGN | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -60.11% | +58.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -3.14% | +3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -16.63% | +15.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.21% | — |
Volatility
WAGN vs. IWO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WAGN | IWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.76% | 22.14% | -10.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 24.59% | -12.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 24.15% | -12.39% |
WAGN vs. IWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
WAGN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than IWO's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
WAGN vs. IWO - Dividend Comparison
WAGN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWO iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.56% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.71% | 0.76% | 0.73% | 0.97% | 0.89% |
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WAGN and IWO have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWO is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWO is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for WAGN.
IWO has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for WAGN.
WAGN is categorized as Global Equities, while IWO is Small Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pabrai and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for WAGN and 0.24% for IWO.
Find the right allocation for WAGN and IWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer