WAGN vs. COMT

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

WAGN (Pabrai Wagons ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WAGN is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Pabrai, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. WAGN is actively managed, while COMT is passively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. WAGN charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.

Performance

WAGN vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WAGN

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMT

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -12.14%
• YTD: 21.01%
• 6M: 21.01%
• 1Y: 25.29%
• 3Y*: 11.30%
• 5Y*: 9.76%
• 10Y*: 7.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAGN vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF	-1.29%
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF	-0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between WAGN and COMT is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2026	-1.00

Return for Risk

WAGN vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAGN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COMT

COMT Risk / Return Rank: 37
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 36
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAGN vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pabrai Wagons ETF (WAGN) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WAGN	COMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.19	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.71	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.45	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.66	—

Drawdowns

WAGN vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAGN drawdown since its inception was -1.29%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAGN and COMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	WAGN	COMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-51.89%	+50.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.57%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.57%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	-17.53%	+16.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.15%	-23.99%	+22.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.48%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WAGN	COMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.04%	21.26%	-13.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.04%	21.18%	-13.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.04%	18.87%	-10.83%

WAGN vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAGN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

WAGN vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

WAGN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF	6.40%	7.74%	4.90%	5.19%	29.79%	17.79%	0.36%	2.61%	11.65%	5.16%	0.52%	1.44%
WAGN Pabrai Wagons ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WAGN and COMT in my portfolio?

WAGN and COMT have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WAGN or COMT?

On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WAGN or COMT?

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for WAGN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WAGN or COMT?

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 6.40%, compared with 0.00% for WAGN.

What is the main difference between WAGN and COMT?

WAGN is categorized as Global Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Pabrai and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for WAGN and 0.48% for COMT.