PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAESX vs. BEMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAESX vs. BEMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund (WAESX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAESX achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly lower than BEMIX's 25.80% return. Over the past 10 years, WAESX has underperformed BEMIX with an annualized return of 8.28%, while BEMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return.


WAESX

1D
-0.92%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
6.04%
6M
6.62%
1Y
11.10%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
-0.96%
10Y*
8.28%

BEMIX

1D
0.79%
1M
7.59%
YTD
25.80%
6M
27.44%
1Y
60.96%
3Y*
28.65%
5Y*
13.00%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAESX vs. BEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WAESX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund
6.04%10.56%-0.12%17.52%-37.38%21.34%48.36%28.05%-11.50%37.66%
BEMIX
Brandes Emerging Markets Fund
25.80%47.83%4.01%22.53%-15.91%1.68%-6.17%18.60%-15.56%26.00%

Correlation

The correlation between WAESX and BEMIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.71

The correlation between WAESX and BEMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAESX vs. BEMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAESX
WAESX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
WAESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAESX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WAESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAESX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

BEMIX
BEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAESX vs. BEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund (WAESX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WAESXBEMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

3.70

-3.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

4.63

-3.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.72

-0.60

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

5.10

-4.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.17

21.30

-18.13

WAESX vs. BEMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAESX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the BEMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAESX and BEMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WAESXBEMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

3.70

-3.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.79

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.60

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.31

-0.05

Drawdowns

WAESX vs. BEMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAESX drawdown since its inception was -45.85%, roughly equal to the maximum BEMIX drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAESX and BEMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAESXBEMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.85%

-46.05%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-12.07%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.75%

-16.08%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.85%

-36.37%

-9.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.85%

-46.05%

+0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.21%

0.00%

-19.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.61%

-14.18%

-2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

2.89%

+0.50%

Volatility

WAESX vs. BEMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund (WAESX) is 5.50%, while Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that WAESX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAESXBEMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

6.65%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.07%

14.22%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.08%

16.66%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.07%

16.55%

+3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.73%

17.09%

+2.64%

WAESX vs. BEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAESX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than BEMIX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAESX vs. BEMIX - Dividend Comparison

WAESX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEMIX
Brandes Emerging Markets Fund
1.71%2.15%3.04%2.45%2.86%2.31%1.31%2.56%1.55%1.41%2.20%1.54%
WAESX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAESX and BEMIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BEMIX has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to WAESX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAESX dropped -45.85% vs BEMIX's -46.05%.

BEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAESX and BEMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer