PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WAEMX vs. WAMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WAEMX vs. WAMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) and Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WAEMX achieves a 24.12% return, which is significantly higher than WAMCX's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, WAEMX has underperformed WAMCX with an annualized return of 8.47%, while WAMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.


WAEMX

1D
-0.47%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
24.12%
6M
28.17%
1Y
35.26%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
8.47%

WAMCX

1D
0.06%
1M
5.08%
YTD
7.13%
6M
4.32%
1Y
17.44%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
-3.87%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WAEMX vs. WAMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
24.12%5.85%-2.21%21.20%-38.76%30.16%32.79%27.45%-18.97%38.20%
WAMCX
Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund
7.13%-2.85%8.25%19.19%-39.71%5.23%71.48%38.09%10.34%31.60%

Correlation

The correlation between WAEMX and WAMCX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2007

0.56

The correlation between WAEMX and WAMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WAEMX vs. WAMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WAEMX
WAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
WAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

WAMCX
WAMCX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
WAMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
WAMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WAEMX vs. WAMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) and Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WAEMXWAMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.16

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

1.14

+3.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.90

3.76

+10.14

WAEMX vs. WAMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WAEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the WAMCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WAEMX and WAMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WAEMXWAMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

0.91

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

-0.14

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.48

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.39

-0.08

Drawdowns

WAEMX vs. WAMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WAEMX drawdown since its inception was -66.35%, roughly equal to the maximum WAMCX drawdown of -66.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WAEMX and WAMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WAEMXWAMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.35%

-66.51%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-16.89%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.56%

-33.21%

+7.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.88%

-53.18%

+8.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

-53.18%

+8.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.18%

-28.01%

+19.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.81%

-15.15%

-1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

5.13%

-2.59%

Volatility

WAEMX vs. WAMCX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund (WAMCX) at 4.94%. This indicates that WAEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WAEMXWAMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

4.94%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.64%

15.89%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.48%

21.33%

-3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.73%

27.39%

-9.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

25.62%

-7.43%

WAEMX vs. WAMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WAEMX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMCX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

WAEMX vs. WAMCX - Dividend Comparison

WAEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.72%, while WAMCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
56.72%70.40%6.49%0.00%3.32%6.03%7.15%5.82%12.81%0.00%0.00%0.02%
WAMCX
Wasatch Ultra Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%12.08%2.99%1.96%7.65%11.92%11.44%9.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


WAEMX and WAMCX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WAEMX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to WAMCX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WAEMX dropped -66.35% vs WAMCX's -66.51%.

WAEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WAEMX and WAMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer