PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VZ vs. GFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VZ vs. GFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VZ achieves a 21.97% return, which is significantly higher than GFL's -16.19% return.


VZ

1D
2.49%
1M
1.91%
YTD
21.97%
6M
21.50%
1Y
18.98%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
4.44%

GFL

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
-16.19%
6M
-18.43%
1Y
-29.04%
3Y*
-0.84%
5Y*
1.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VZ vs. GFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
21.97%8.86%13.14%2.71%-20.02%-7.55%5.87%
GFL
GFL Environmental Inc.
-16.19%-3.44%29.26%18.24%-22.65%29.88%67.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VZ and GFL is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020

0.12

The correlation between VZ and GFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VZ:

$202.54B

GFL:

$12.89B

EPS

VZ:

$4.10

GFL:

CA$0.57

PE Ratio

VZ:

11.72

GFL:

88.98

PS Ratio

VZ:

1.46

GFL:

2.76

PB Ratio

VZ:

1.96

GFL:

2.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

VZ:

$139.15B

GFL:

CA$6.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VZ:

$81.89B

GFL:

CA$1.38B

EBITDA (TTM)

VZ:

$48.65B

GFL:

CA$2.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VZ vs. GFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VZ
VZ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GFL
GFL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
GFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VZ vs. GFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VZGFLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.80

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

-0.85

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.06

-1.84

+4.90

VZ vs. GFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the GFL Sharpe Ratio of -1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VZ and GFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VZ vs. GFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VZ drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, which is greater than GFL's maximum drawdown of -42.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VZ and GFL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VZGFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.66%

-42.76%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-34.20%

+20.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.93%

-34.88%

+19.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.38%

-42.76%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.96%

-30.16%

+25.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-14.41%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.23%

15.78%

-9.55%

Volatility

VZ vs. GFL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) is 6.87%, while GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) has a volatility of 8.65%. This indicates that VZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VZGFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.87%

8.65%

-1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

21.75%

-3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.78%

25.61%

-2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

29.80%

-8.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

32.98%

-12.62%

Dividends

VZ vs. GFL - Dividend Comparison

VZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than GFL's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFL
GFL Environmental Inc.
0.18%0.14%0.12%0.15%0.16%0.11%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
5.75%6.68%6.68%6.96%6.53%4.85%4.21%3.95%4.22%4.39%4.26%4.79%

Financials

VZ vs. GFL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Verizon Communications Inc. and GFL Environmental Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
34.44B
1.65B
(VZ) Total Revenue
(GFL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. VZ values in USD, GFL values in CAD

VZ vs. GFL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Verizon Communications Inc. and GFL Environmental Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
60.3%
18.2%
Portfolio components
VZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.77B and revenue of 34.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.

GFL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GFL Environmental Inc. reported a gross profit of 300.57M and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.

VZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported an operating income of 8.24B and revenue of 34.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

GFL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GFL Environmental Inc. reported an operating income of 34.09M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.

VZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported a net income of 5.05B and revenue of 34.44B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

GFL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GFL Environmental Inc. reported a net income of -216.26M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of -13.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VZ and GFL have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GFL has higher volatility (8.65%) compared to VZ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VZ dropped -50.66% vs GFL's -42.76%.

VZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VZ and GFL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer