PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VXUS vs. SPGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VXUS vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VXUS having a 15.23% return and SPGM slightly lower at 15.04%. Over the past 10 years, VXUS has underperformed SPGM with an annualized return of 9.59%, while SPGM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.78% annualized return.


VXUS

1D
1.68%
1M
1.90%
6M
8.24%
YTD
15.23%
1Y
28.78%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
9.59%
ALL TIME*
6.70%

SPGM

1D
1.84%
1M
2.90%
6M
11.08%
YTD
15.04%
1Y
27.20%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*
12.78%
ALL TIME*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.14M$13.82M$20.56M
$377.93M$404.12M$507.23M

VXUS vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
15.23%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
15.04%23.62%16.75%21.34%-17.53%21.13%15.28%26.58%-10.12%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VXUS and SPGM is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2012

0.78

The correlation between VXUS and SPGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VXUS vs. SPGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VXUS
SPGM

Technology

23.7%
30.7%

Financial Services

23.2%
16.4%

Industrials

14.5%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
8.7%

Healthcare

6.8%
8.4%

Basic Materials

6.6%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.5%

Energy

4.2%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.8%
7.7%

Utilities

2.9%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.8%

Technology

VXUS
23.7%
SPGM
30.7%

Financial Services

VXUS
23.2%
SPGM
16.4%

Industrials

VXUS
14.5%
SPGM
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VXUS
6.8%
SPGM
8.7%

Healthcare

VXUS
6.8%
SPGM
8.4%

Basic Materials

VXUS
6.6%
SPGM
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

VXUS
4.8%
SPGM
4.5%

Energy

VXUS
4.2%
SPGM
3.7%

Communication Services

VXUS
3.8%
SPGM
7.7%

Utilities

VXUS
2.9%
SPGM
2.0%

Real Estate

VXUS
1.7%
SPGM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VXUS vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SPGM
SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VXUS vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VXUSSPGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.88

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.40

12.11

-2.71

VXUS vs. SPGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VXUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the SPGM Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VXUS and SPGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VXUS vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VXUS drawdown since its inception was -35.97%, which is greater than SPGM's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXUS and SPGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VXUSSPGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.97%

-33.97%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-9.50%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

-16.90%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-25.93%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

-33.97%

-2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

0.00%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-4.77%

-3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.25%

+0.82%

Volatility

VXUS vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) at 4.34%. This indicates that VXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VXUSSPGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

4.34%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.06%

11.88%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.91%

14.13%

+2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.37%

16.21%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

17.34%

-0.30%

VXUS vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VXUS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VXUS vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison

VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than SPGM's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPGM
SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
1.76%1.89%1.98%2.09%2.37%1.94%1.45%2.46%1.89%2.29%1.87%3.70%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.53%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VXUS and SPGM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VXUS has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to SPGM (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXUS dropped -35.97% vs SPGM's -33.97%.

On 10-year performance, SPGM leads with 12.78% vs 9.59% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SPGM has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 12.78% return vs 9.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPGM.

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.76% for SPGM.

VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, while SPGM tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXUS and 0.09% for SPGM.

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VXUS and SPGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer