VXUS vs. ACWV
VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Global Equities funds - VXUS tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index while ACWV tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VXUS returned 9.56%/yr vs 6.98%/yr for ACWV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VXUS charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACWV.
Performance
VXUS vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VXUS achieves a 12.84% return, which is significantly higher than ACWV's 3.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VXUS has outperformed ACWV with an annualized return of 9.56%, while ACWV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.98% annualized return.
VXUS
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- YTD
- 12.84%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
ACWV
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 3.42%
- 1Y
- 5.53%
- 3Y*
- 9.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- 6.98%
VXUS vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 12.84% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.42% | 11.04% | 11.38% | 8.23% | -10.36% | 13.97% | 3.04% | 21.04% | -1.42% | 18.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXUS and ACWV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.78 |
The correlation between VXUS and ACWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VXUS vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VXUS
ACWV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
VXUS
ACWV
Technology
VXUS
ACWV
Industrials
VXUS
ACWV
Consumer Cyclical
VXUS
ACWV
Basic Materials
VXUS
ACWV
Healthcare
VXUS
ACWV
Consumer Defensive
VXUS
ACWV
Energy
VXUS
ACWV
Communication Services
VXUS
ACWV
Utilities
VXUS
ACWV
Real Estate
VXUS
ACWV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VXUS vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank
VXUS
ACWV
VXUS vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VXUS | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.13 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 0.87 | +1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.76 | 2.49 | +6.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VXUS vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXUS drawdown since its inception was -35.97%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXUS and ACWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VXUS | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.97% | -28.82% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.27% | -6.37% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | -7.56% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -18.14% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.97% | -28.82% | -7.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -1.91% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.17% | -3.11% | -5.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.22% | +0.77% |
Volatility
VXUS vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 3.15%. This indicates that VXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VXUS | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 3.15% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.76% | 6.25% | +8.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.59% | 8.06% | +8.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 10.27% | +6.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 12.29% | +4.71% |
VXUS vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VXUS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VXUS vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison
VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than ACWV's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 2.41% | 2.18% | 1.92% | 1.77% | 2.54% | 2.32% | 2.04% | 2.56% | 2.28% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.58% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VXUS and ACWV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to ACWV (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXUS dropped -35.97% vs ACWV's -28.82%.
On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 9.56% vs 6.98% for ACWV. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 9.56% return vs 6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ACWV.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 1.94% for ACWV.
VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, while ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXUS and 0.20% for ACWV.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VXUS and ACWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer