PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWSTX vs. NMTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWSTX vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VWSTX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWSTX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than NMTRX's 2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, VWSTX has underperformed NMTRX with an annualized return of 1.95%, while NMTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.36% annualized return.


VWSTX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.50%
1Y
3.68%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
2.51%
10Y*
1.95%

NMTRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.90%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.88%
1Y
8.18%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
2.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWSTX vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWSTX
Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares
1.17%4.79%3.68%3.87%-0.81%0.17%1.82%2.50%1.59%1.00%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
2.47%3.90%1.99%6.21%-11.98%2.69%5.25%9.26%1.06%7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between VWSTX and NMTRX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.51

The correlation between VWSTX and NMTRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWSTX vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWSTX
VWSTX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
VWSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
VWSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NMTRX
NMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWSTX vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VWSTX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWSTXNMTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.67

1.71

+0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.45

3.23

+2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.05

11.87

+12.18

VWSTX vs. NMTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWSTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.44, which is comparable to the NMTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWSTX and NMTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWSTXNMTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44

2.84

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.08

0.12

+1.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.76

0.54

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.04

1.00

+1.04

Drawdowns

VWSTX vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWSTX drawdown since its inception was -3.09%, smaller than the maximum NMTRX drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWSTX and NMTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWSTXNMTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.09%

-16.36%

+13.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.69%

-2.65%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.01%

-5.77%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.32%

-16.36%

+14.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.08%

-16.36%

+13.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-2.91%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.16%

0.72%

-0.56%

Volatility

VWSTX vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares (VWSTX) is 0.38%, while Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that VWSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWSTXNMTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

1.25%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.81%

2.25%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09%

3.01%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.21%

4.03%

-2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.11%

4.40%

-3.29%

VWSTX vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWSTX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWSTX vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison

VWSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than NMTRX's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
4.58%4.46%3.55%3.67%3.28%2.73%2.92%3.20%3.47%3.28%3.71%3.91%
VWSTX
Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Investor Shares
3.04%3.90%3.73%2.42%1.16%0.61%1.17%1.71%1.45%1.06%0.87%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWSTX and NMTRX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMTRX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to VWSTX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWSTX dropped -3.09% vs NMTRX's -16.36%.

VWSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWSTX and NMTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer