VWRP.L vs. ENCG.L
VWRP.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and ENCG.L (L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWRP.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while ENCG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VWRP.L returned 17.99%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for ENCG.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VWRP.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ENCG.L.
Performance
VWRP.L vs. ENCG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VWRP.L is traded in GBP, while ENCG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ENCG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWRP.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly lower than ENCG.L's 24.41% return.
VWRP.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
ENCG.L
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 24.41%
- 6M
- 22.50%
- 1Y
- 33.86%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VWRP.L vs. ENCG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWRP.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 11.92% | 13.94% | 19.60% | 15.64% | -8.41% | 7.39% |
ENCG.L L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF | 24.41% | 0.89% | 5.39% | -7.83% | 38.17% | 13.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWRP.L and ENCG.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2021 | 0.11 |
The correlation between VWRP.L and ENCG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VWRP.L vs. ENCG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWRP.L
ENCG.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
VWRP.L
ENCG.L
-
Financial Services
VWRP.L
ENCG.L
-
Industrials
VWRP.L
ENCG.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
VWRP.L
ENCG.L
-
Communication Services
VWRP.L
ENCG.L
-
Healthcare
VWRP.L
ENCG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
VWRP.L
ENCG.L
-
Energy
VWRP.L
ENCG.L
-
Basic Materials
VWRP.L
ENCG.L
-
Utilities
VWRP.L
ENCG.L
-
Real Estate
VWRP.L
ENCG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWRP.L vs. ENCG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VWRP.L
ENCG.L
VWRP.L vs. ENCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) and L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWRP.L | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.34 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 4.02 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.06 | 10.88 | +6.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWRP.L | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 1.91 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.79 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
VWRP.L vs. ENCG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWRP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, roughly equal to the maximum ENCG.L drawdown of -26.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRP.L and ENCG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWRP.L | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.10% | -26.32% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -8.38% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | -17.11% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -4.28% | +3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | -13.09% | +9.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 3.11% | -1.36% |
Volatility
VWRP.L vs. ENCG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) is 2.95%, while L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that VWRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWRP.L | ENCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 6.29% | -3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 14.33% | -6.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 17.67% | -7.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.87% | 18.12% | -5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 18.12% | -3.16% |
VWRP.L vs. ENCG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWRP.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VWRP.L vs. ENCG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VWRP.L nor ENCG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VWRP.L and ENCG.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VWRP.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VWRP.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENCG.L.
VWRP.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ENCG.L is Commodities. VWRP.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while ENCG.L tracks Barclays Backwardation Tilt Multi-Strategy Capped. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRP.L and 0.30% for ENCG.L.
Find the right allocation for VWRP.L and ENCG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer