PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENCG.L vs. COMM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ENCG.L vs. COMM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ENCG.L vs. COMM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ENCG.L
L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF
23.96%0.89%5.39%-7.83%38.17%13.94%
COMM.L
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
23.98%8.53%6.19%-12.55%28.34%7.26%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ENCG.L having a 23.96% return and COMM.L slightly higher at 23.98%.


ENCG.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
13.93%
YTD
23.96%
6M
24.96%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
10Y*

COMM.L

1D
-2.25%
1M
9.40%
YTD
23.98%
6M
32.13%
1Y
26.96%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
14.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ENCG.L vs. COMM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENCG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than COMM.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ENCG.L vs. COMM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENCG.L
ENCG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ENCG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

COMM.L
COMM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
COMM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
COMM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENCG.L vs. COMM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENCG.LCOMM.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

1.61

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

2.13

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.64

-1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.92

8.16

-4.24

ENCG.L vs. COMM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENCG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the COMM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENCG.L and COMM.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENCG.LCOMM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.61

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.53

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between ENCG.L and COMM.L is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ENCG.L vs. COMM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENCG.L nor COMM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ENCG.L vs. COMM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENCG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.32%, smaller than the maximum COMM.L drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENCG.L and COMM.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ENCG.LCOMM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.32%

-28.49%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.85%

-9.40%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-2.25%

+1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.48%

-12.34%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.21%

3.34%

+1.87%

Volatility

ENCG.L vs. COMM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Multi-Strategy Enhanced Commodities UCITS ETF (ENCG.L) is 6.97%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) has a volatility of 8.68%. This indicates that ENCG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ENCG.LCOMM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.97%

8.68%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

13.67%

-2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24%

16.71%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.84%

16.04%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

15.11%

+2.73%