PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRL.L vs. LGGG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VWRL.L is traded in GBP, while LGGG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LGGG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRL.L achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly higher than LGGG.L's 9.76% return.


VWRL.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.70%
YTD
11.71%
6M
12.01%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
13.22%

LGGG.L

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.40%
YTD
9.76%
6M
9.88%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
18.26%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
11.71%13.99%19.60%15.61%-8.44%20.05%12.13%22.04%-5.92%
LGGG.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF
9.76%12.92%21.13%18.08%-8.24%23.53%12.41%22.99%-27.80%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRL.L and LGGG.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018

0.97

The correlation between VWRL.L and LGGG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWRL.L
LGGG.L

Technology

32.5%
31.5%

Financial Services

15.3%
15.2%

Industrials

10.5%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
9.4%

Communication Services

8.4%
9.2%

Healthcare

7.7%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.9%

Basic Materials

3.8%
3.2%

Energy

3.8%
3.6%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.7%

Technology

VWRL.L
32.5%
LGGG.L
31.5%

Financial Services

VWRL.L
15.3%
LGGG.L
15.2%

Industrials

VWRL.L
10.5%
LGGG.L
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VWRL.L
9.2%
LGGG.L
9.4%

Communication Services

VWRL.L
8.4%
LGGG.L
9.2%

Healthcare

VWRL.L
7.7%
LGGG.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

VWRL.L
4.6%
LGGG.L
4.9%

Basic Materials

VWRL.L
3.8%
LGGG.L
3.2%

Energy

VWRL.L
3.8%
LGGG.L
3.6%

Utilities

VWRL.L
2.4%
LGGG.L
2.3%

Real Estate

VWRL.L
1.8%
LGGG.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRL.L vs. LGGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRL.L
VWRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

LGGG.L
LGGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWRL.LLGGG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.47

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

3.88

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.87

15.16

+0.71

VWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the LGGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRL.L and LGGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRL.L drawdown since its inception was -24.99%, smaller than the maximum LGGG.L drawdown of -30.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRL.L and LGGG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRL.LLGGG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.99%

-30.19%

+5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-6.67%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-19.95%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.47%

-19.95%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-1.27%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-7.18%

+3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

1.71%

+0.08%

Volatility

VWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) at 3.20%. This indicates that VWRL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRL.LLGGG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

3.20%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

7.79%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.77%

10.47%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.94%

19.12%

-6.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.23%

20.36%

-6.13%

VWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRL.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than LGGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while LGGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGGG.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.27%1.39%1.49%1.72%2.03%1.45%1.58%1.95%2.22%1.90%1.95%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, VWRL.L and LGGG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for VWRL.L.

VWRL.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while LGGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for VWRL.L and 0.10% for LGGG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRL.L and LGGG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer