PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRD.L achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly higher than VUAA.L's 9.14% return.


VWRD.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.47%
YTD
11.63%
6M
12.71%
1Y
28.23%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
12.64%

VUAA.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
2.12%
YTD
9.14%
6M
9.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VWRD.L and VUAA.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.95

VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWRD.L
VUAA.L

Technology

30.2%
35.7%

Financial Services

16.1%
11.6%

Industrials

10.2%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
10.2%

Communication Services

8.9%
11.3%

Healthcare

8.1%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

4.3%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.8%

Utilities

2.9%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.9%

Technology

VWRD.L
30.2%
VUAA.L
35.7%

Financial Services

VWRD.L
16.1%
VUAA.L
11.6%

Industrials

VWRD.L
10.2%
VUAA.L
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VWRD.L
9.1%
VUAA.L
10.2%

Communication Services

VWRD.L
8.9%
VUAA.L
11.3%

Healthcare

VWRD.L
8.1%
VUAA.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

VWRD.L
4.9%
VUAA.L
4.9%

Energy

VWRD.L
4.3%
VUAA.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

VWRD.L
3.6%
VUAA.L
1.8%

Utilities

VWRD.L
2.9%
VUAA.L
2.4%

Real Estate

VWRD.L
1.6%
VUAA.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VUAA.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWRD.LVUAA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.61

VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWRD.LVUAA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

2.23

-1.41

Drawdowns

VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, which is greater than VUAA.L's maximum drawdown of -8.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and VUAA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRD.LVUAA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-8.18%

-25.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-1.61%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-1.11%

-3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.91%

+0.19%

Volatility

VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRD.LVUAA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

11.79%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

11.79%

+3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

11.79%

+3.93%

VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while VUAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VUAA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.24%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VWRD.L and VUAA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRD.L.

VWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VUAA.L is S&P 500. VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRD.L and 0.07% for VUAA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRD.L and VUAA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer