VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L
VWRD.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF) and VUAA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - VWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while VUAA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Return. Both are passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VWRD.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VUAA.L.
Performance
VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWRD.L achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly higher than VUAA.L's 9.14% return.
VWRD.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 11.63%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- 1Y
- 28.23%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
VUAA.L
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 11.63% | 14.96% |
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 9.14% | 15.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWRD.L and VUAA.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.95 |
VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWRD.L
VUAA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VWRD.L
VUAA.L
Financial Services
VWRD.L
VUAA.L
Industrials
VWRD.L
VUAA.L
Consumer Cyclical
VWRD.L
VUAA.L
Communication Services
VWRD.L
VUAA.L
Healthcare
VWRD.L
VUAA.L
Consumer Defensive
VWRD.L
VUAA.L
Energy
VWRD.L
VUAA.L
Basic Materials
VWRD.L
VUAA.L
Utilities
VWRD.L
VUAA.L
Real Estate
VWRD.L
VUAA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L — Risk / Return Rank
VWRD.L
VUAA.L
VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWRD.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.61 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWRD.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 2.23 | -1.41 |
Drawdowns
VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, which is greater than VUAA.L's maximum drawdown of -8.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and VUAA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWRD.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.83% | -8.18% | -25.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -1.61% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -1.11% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.91% | +0.19% |
Volatility
VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWRD.L | VUAA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.39% | 11.79% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 11.79% | +3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 11.79% | +3.93% |
VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWRD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Dividend Comparison
VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while VUAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 1.24% | 1.38% | 1.52% | 1.69% | 2.05% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.88% | 2.29% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VWRD.L and VUAA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRD.L.
VWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VUAA.L is S&P 500. VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRD.L and 0.07% for VUAA.L.
Find the right allocation for VWRD.L and VUAA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer