PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRD.L vs. V3GS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRD.L vs. V3GS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VWRD.L is traded in USD, while V3GS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the V3GS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRD.L achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than V3GS.L's 1.76% return.


VWRD.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.69%
6M
9.54%
YTD
11.15%
1Y
23.52%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
12.44%

V3GS.L

1D
1.14%
1M
0.32%
6M
1.48%
YTD
1.76%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
10.09%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRD.L vs. V3GS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
11.15%22.39%17.65%22.31%-18.19%9.86%
V3GS.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
1.76%18.80%6.00%18.18%-21.88%-2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRD.L and V3GS.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRD.L vs. V3GS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

V3GS.L
V3GS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
V3GS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRD.L vs. V3GS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWRD.LV3GS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.16

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

1.46

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.62

3.81

+6.81

VWRD.L vs. V3GS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the V3GS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRD.L and V3GS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWRD.L vs. V3GS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum V3GS.L drawdown of -36.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and V3GS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRD.LV3GS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-36.25%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-5.28%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-10.59%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-36.18%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-1.28%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-10.26%

+5.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.03%

+0.18%

Volatility

VWRD.L vs. V3GS.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L) at 2.27%. This indicates that VWRD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V3GS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRD.LV3GS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

2.27%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

6.59%

+4.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

8.69%

+4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.41%

11.71%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.58%

11.58%

+4.00%

VWRD.L vs. V3GS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than V3GS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWRD.L vs. V3GS.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than V3GS.L's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
V3GS.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
2.53%3.59%4.25%4.00%2.43%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.27%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRD.L and V3GS.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3GS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3GS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRD.L.

VWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while V3GS.L is Global Corporate Bonds. VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while V3GS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRD.L and 0.15% for V3GS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRD.L and V3GS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer