PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRD.L vs. UDVD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRD.L vs. UDVD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRD.L achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly higher than UDVD.L's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, VWRD.L has outperformed UDVD.L with an annualized return of 12.64%, while UDVD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.82% annualized return.


VWRD.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.28%
YTD
11.63%
6M
13.01%
1Y
28.61%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
12.64%

UDVD.L

1D
0.11%
1M
0.79%
YTD
6.99%
6M
7.81%
1Y
12.89%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
8.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRD.L vs. UDVD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
11.63%22.38%17.65%22.31%-18.19%18.52%16.13%25.67%-9.70%24.36%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
6.99%8.57%7.64%2.06%-0.33%25.04%0.77%22.66%-3.94%15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRD.L and UDVD.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2012

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between VWRD.L and UDVD.L has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VWRD.L vs. UDVD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWRD.L
UDVD.L

Technology

30.2%
8.9%

Financial Services

16.1%
11.5%

Industrials

10.2%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
5.2%

Communication Services

8.9%
3.5%

Healthcare

8.1%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
17.0%

Energy

4.3%
4.5%

Basic Materials

3.6%
6.4%

Utilities

2.9%
14.8%

Real Estate

1.6%
4.6%

Technology

VWRD.L
30.2%
UDVD.L
8.9%

Financial Services

VWRD.L
16.1%
UDVD.L
11.5%

Industrials

VWRD.L
10.2%
UDVD.L
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VWRD.L
9.1%
UDVD.L
5.2%

Communication Services

VWRD.L
8.9%
UDVD.L
3.5%

Healthcare

VWRD.L
8.1%
UDVD.L
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

VWRD.L
4.9%
UDVD.L
17.0%

Energy

VWRD.L
4.3%
UDVD.L
4.5%

Basic Materials

VWRD.L
3.6%
UDVD.L
6.4%

Utilities

VWRD.L
2.9%
UDVD.L
14.8%

Real Estate

VWRD.L
1.6%
UDVD.L
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRD.L vs. UDVD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

UDVD.L
UDVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRD.L vs. UDVD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWRD.LUDVD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.23

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

1.82

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.61

4.63

+8.98

VWRD.L vs. UDVD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRD.L and UDVD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWRD.LUDVD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.29

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.41

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.56

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.71

+0.11

Drawdowns

VWRD.L vs. UDVD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum UDVD.L drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and UDVD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRD.LUDVD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-36.12%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-7.06%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-15.26%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-15.26%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

-36.12%

+2.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-3.61%

+2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-3.44%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.78%

-0.68%

Volatility

VWRD.L vs. UDVD.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) at 2.64%. This indicates that VWRD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UDVD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRD.LUDVD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

2.64%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

7.08%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

9.92%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

13.92%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

15.70%

+0.02%

VWRD.L vs. UDVD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than UDVD.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWRD.L vs. UDVD.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than UDVD.L's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.05%2.17%2.03%2.24%2.13%2.15%2.36%2.01%2.27%1.78%1.83%2.06%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.24%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRD.L and UDVD.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRD.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UDVD.L.

VWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while UDVD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while UDVD.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRD.L and 0.35% for UDVD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRD.L and UDVD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer