PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRD.L vs. SSHY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRD.L vs. SSHY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VWRD.L is traded in USD, while SSHY.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SSHY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRD.L achieves a 9.62% return, which is significantly higher than SSHY.L's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, VWRD.L has outperformed SSHY.L with an annualized return of 13.22%, while SSHY.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.58% annualized return.


VWRD.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
9.62%
6M
9.53%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*
13.22%

SSHY.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.09%
YTD
1.23%
6M
1.43%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
5.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRD.L vs. SSHY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
9.62%22.39%17.65%22.31%-18.19%18.52%16.13%25.67%-9.70%24.35%
SSHY.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
1.23%9.05%8.34%11.06%-4.83%4.75%3.40%10.94%-0.89%5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRD.L and SSHY.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012

0.34

The correlation between VWRD.L and SSHY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRD.L vs. SSHY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SSHY.L
SSHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SSHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRD.L vs. SSHY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWRD.LSSHY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.20

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.27

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

9.55

+1.74

VWRD.L vs. SSHY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the SSHY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRD.L and SSHY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWRD.L vs. SSHY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum SSHY.L drawdown of -41.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and SSHY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRD.LSSHY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-41.58%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-2.58%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-5.07%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-9.73%

-16.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

-21.77%

-12.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-0.51%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-18.99%

+14.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

0.61%

+1.56%

Volatility

VWRD.L vs. SSHY.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L) at 1.78%. This indicates that VWRD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSHY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRD.LSSHY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

1.78%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

3.91%

+6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

4.82%

+7.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

6.66%

+8.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

7.42%

+8.23%

VWRD.L vs. SSHY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than SSHY.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWRD.L vs. SSHY.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than SSHY.L's 6.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSHY.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
6.89%7.33%7.48%6.52%4.86%4.47%5.24%5.27%5.10%5.48%4.92%5.11%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.29%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRD.L and SSHY.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRD.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SSHY.L.

VWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SSHY.L is High Yield Bonds. VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while SSHY.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRD.L and 0.55% for SSHY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRD.L and SSHY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer