PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VWRD.L vs. MINT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VWRD.L vs. MINT.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

VWRD.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF) and MINT.L (PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - VWRD.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index while MINT.L tracks the PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWRD.L returned 12.44%/yr vs 2.65%/yr for MINT.L. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

VWRD.L vs. MINT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRD.L achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than MINT.L's 2.39% return. Over the past 10 years, VWRD.L has outperformed MINT.L with an annualized return of 12.44%, while MINT.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.65% annualized return.

VWRD.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.69%
6M
9.54%
YTD
11.15%
1Y
23.52%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
12.44%

MINT.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.39%
6M
2.17%
YTD
2.39%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
2.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRD.L vs. MINT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF		11.15%22.39%17.65%22.31%-18.19%18.52%16.13%25.67%-9.70%24.35%
MINT.L
PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF		2.39%4.66%5.75%5.72%-0.67%-0.09%1.30%3.28%1.65%1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRD.L and MINT.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF

PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF

Often compared with VWRD.L:
VWRD.L vs. VWRP.LVWRD.L vs. IWDA.LVWRD.L vs. VOOVWRD.L vs. JEPQVWRD.L vs. JEPG.LVWRD.L vs. EGLN.LVWRD.L vs. SPY

Return for Risk

VWRD.L vs. MINT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
MINT.L
MINT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MINT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MINT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRD.L vs. MINT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VWRD.LMINT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.82
7.86

-6.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.72
16.90

-14.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

3.57

-2.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

45.35

-42.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.62

232.26

-221.64

VWRD.L vs. MINT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the MINT.L Sharpe Ratio of 7.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRD.L and MINT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWRD.L vs. MINT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, which is greater than MINT.L's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and MINT.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VWRD.LMINT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-3.89%

-29.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-0.10%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-0.62%

-15.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-2.47%

-23.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

-3.89%

-29.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

0.00%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-0.23%

-4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

0.02%

+2.19%

Volatility

VWRD.L vs. MINT.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) at 0.14%. This indicates that VWRD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VWRD.LMINT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

0.14%

+3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

0.35%

+10.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

0.58%

+12.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.41%

0.76%

+14.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.58%

0.95%

+14.63%

Dividends

VWRD.L vs. MINT.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than MINT.L's 4.36% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MINT.L
PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF		4.36%4.43%5.18%4.81%1.51%0.34%1.17%2.63%2.33%1.56%1.31%0.79%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF		1.27%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

VWRD.L and MINT.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while MINT.L tracks PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and PIMCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRD.L and MINT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer