PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRD.L vs. IWVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRD.L vs. IWVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VWRD.L is traded in USD, while IWVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IWVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRD.L achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly lower than IWVG.L's 34.02% return.


VWRD.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.28%
YTD
11.63%
6M
13.01%
1Y
28.61%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
12.64%

IWVG.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
12.07%
YTD
34.02%
6M
36.95%
1Y
61.59%
3Y*
28.51%
5Y*
15.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRD.L vs. IWVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
11.63%22.38%17.65%22.31%-18.19%18.52%16.13%25.67%-11.60%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
34.02%37.12%3.45%19.01%-9.76%20.37%-3.98%19.05%-16.16%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRD.L and IWVG.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018

0.82

The correlation between VWRD.L and IWVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWRD.L vs. IWVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWRD.L
IWVG.L

Technology

30.2%
33.9%

Financial Services

16.1%
14.8%

Industrials

10.2%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
7.9%

Communication Services

8.9%
7.6%

Healthcare

8.1%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.5%

Energy

4.3%
3.8%

Basic Materials

3.6%
3.0%

Utilities

2.9%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.8%

Technology

VWRD.L
30.2%
IWVG.L
33.9%

Financial Services

VWRD.L
16.1%
IWVG.L
14.8%

Industrials

VWRD.L
10.2%
IWVG.L
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VWRD.L
9.1%
IWVG.L
7.9%

Communication Services

VWRD.L
8.9%
IWVG.L
7.6%

Healthcare

VWRD.L
8.1%
IWVG.L
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

VWRD.L
4.9%
IWVG.L
4.5%

Energy

VWRD.L
4.3%
IWVG.L
3.8%

Basic Materials

VWRD.L
3.6%
IWVG.L
3.0%

Utilities

VWRD.L
2.9%
IWVG.L
2.5%

Real Estate

VWRD.L
1.6%
IWVG.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRD.L vs. IWVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IWVG.L
IWVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRD.L vs. IWVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWRD.LIWVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.73

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

7.09

-3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.61

26.95

-13.34

VWRD.L vs. IWVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is lower than the IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRD.L and IWVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWRD.LIWVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

4.13

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.97

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.62

+0.20

Drawdowns

VWRD.L vs. IWVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum IWVG.L drawdown of -35.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and IWVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRD.LIWVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-35.72%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-8.65%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-14.52%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-26.90%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.82%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-6.70%

+2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.28%

-0.18%

Volatility

VWRD.L vs. IWVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) is 3.88%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that VWRD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRD.LIWVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

6.04%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

11.94%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

14.82%

-2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

15.70%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

17.58%

-1.86%

VWRD.L vs. IWVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than IWVG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWRD.L vs. IWVG.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while IWVG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%0.00%1.82%3.23%3.12%2.61%2.37%2.90%2.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.24%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRD.L and IWVG.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRD.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWVG.L.

VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRD.L and 0.30% for IWVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRD.L and IWVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer