VWRA.L vs. VWRD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VWRA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and VWRD.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds from Vanguard tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWRA.L returned 11.25%/yr vs 11.25%/yr for VWRD.L. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.22% expense ratio.

Performance

VWRA.L vs. VWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VWRA.L having a 11.59% return and VWRD.L slightly higher at 11.63%.

VWRA.L

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 11.59%
• 6M: 13.04%
• 1Y: 28.67%
• 3Y*: 21.09%
• 5Y*: 11.25%
• 10Y*: —

VWRD.L

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 4.28%
• YTD: 11.63%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 28.61%
• 3Y*: 21.10%
• 5Y*: 11.25%
• 10Y*: 12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRA.L vs. VWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	11.59%	22.45%	17.65%	22.28%	-18.11%	18.46%	16.19%	7.33%
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF	11.63%	22.38%	17.65%	22.31%	-18.19%	18.52%	16.13%	7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRA.L and VWRD.L is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2019	0.99

The correlation between VWRA.L and VWRD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWRA.L vs. VWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VWRA.L	VWRD.L
Technology	31.1%	30.2%
Financial Services	16.0%	16.1%
Industrials	9.8%	10.2%
Communication Services	9.1%	8.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	9.1%
Healthcare	8.2%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	4.9%
Energy	4.3%	4.3%
Basic Materials	3.3%	3.6%
Utilities	2.7%	2.9%
Real Estate	1.4%	1.6%

Return for Risk

VWRA.L vs. VWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRA.L

VWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
VWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
VWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
VWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
VWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 74

VWRD.L

VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRA.L vs. VWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VWRA.L	VWRD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.30	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	3.40	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.43	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	3.24	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.63	13.61	+0.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VWRA.L vs. VWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRA.L and VWRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VWRA.L	VWRD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	2.30	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.73	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.82	-0.04

Drawdowns

VWRA.L vs. VWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, roughly equal to the maximum VWRD.L drawdown of -33.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRA.L and VWRD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VWRA.L	VWRD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.62%	-33.83%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-8.80%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.26%	-16.25%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.06%	-26.02%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-0.78%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-4.62%	-0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	2.10%	0.00%

Volatility

VWRA.L vs. VWRD.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) have volatilities of 3.87% and 3.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VWRA.L	VWRD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	3.88%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.78%	9.80%	-0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.36%	12.39%	-0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.36%	15.32%	+0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.28%	15.72%	+1.56%

VWRA.L vs. VWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VWRA.L and VWRD.L have an expense ratio of 0.22%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VWRA.L vs. VWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF	1.24%	1.38%	1.52%	1.69%	2.05%	1.48%	1.47%	1.88%	2.29%	1.82%	2.04%	2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VWRA.L and VWRD.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, VWRA.L and VWRD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, VWRA.L or VWRD.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.22% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VWRA.L or VWRD.L?

VWRA.L and VWRD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.22% per year.

What is the main difference between VWRA.L and VWRD.L?

Both ETFs track FTSE All-World Index.