PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRA.L vs. VUSA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRA.L vs. VUSA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VWRA.L is traded in USD, while VUSA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUSA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRA.L achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than VUSA.L's 10.25% return.


VWRA.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
4.27%
YTD
11.59%
6M
13.04%
1Y
28.67%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*

VUSA.L

1D
0.08%
1M
4.62%
YTD
10.25%
6M
11.29%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
22.08%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
15.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRA.L vs. VUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VWRA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
11.59%22.45%17.65%22.28%-18.11%18.46%16.19%7.33%
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.25%17.65%25.21%26.13%-18.75%29.80%17.14%7.96%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRA.L and VUSA.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2019

0.89

The correlation between VWRA.L and VUSA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWRA.L vs. VUSA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWRA.L
VUSA.L

Technology

31.1%
35.7%

Financial Services

16.0%
11.6%

Industrials

9.8%
8.3%

Communication Services

9.1%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
10.2%

Healthcare

8.2%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.9%

Energy

4.3%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.8%

Utilities

2.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.9%

Technology

VWRA.L
31.1%
VUSA.L
35.7%

Financial Services

VWRA.L
16.0%
VUSA.L
11.6%

Industrials

VWRA.L
9.8%
VUSA.L
8.3%

Communication Services

VWRA.L
9.1%
VUSA.L
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VWRA.L
9.1%
VUSA.L
10.2%

Healthcare

VWRA.L
8.2%
VUSA.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

VWRA.L
4.8%
VUSA.L
4.9%

Energy

VWRA.L
4.3%
VUSA.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

VWRA.L
3.3%
VUSA.L
1.8%

Utilities

VWRA.L
2.7%
VUSA.L
2.4%

Real Estate

VWRA.L
1.4%
VUSA.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRA.L vs. VUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRA.L
VWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VUSA.L
VUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRA.L vs. VUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWRA.LVUSA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

3.19

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.63

13.78

-0.14

VWRA.L vs. VUSA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRA.L and VUSA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWRA.LVUSA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.48

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.88

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.96

-0.18

Drawdowns

VWRA.L vs. VUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, roughly equal to the maximum VUSA.L drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRA.L and VUSA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRA.LVUSA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.62%

-33.50%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-8.69%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-18.45%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

-25.32%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.54%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.39%

-3.71%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.02%

+0.08%

Volatility

VWRA.L vs. VUSA.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) at 2.60%. This indicates that VWRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRA.LVUSA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

2.60%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

7.99%

+1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

11.18%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

15.63%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

16.21%

+1.07%

VWRA.L vs. VUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRA.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWRA.L vs. VUSA.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.87%0.95%1.00%1.24%1.41%1.04%1.44%1.50%1.72%1.61%1.58%1.73%
VWRA.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRA.L and VUSA.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRA.L.

VWRA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VUSA.L is S&P 500. VWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRA.L and 0.07% for VUSA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRA.L and VUSA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer