VWRA.L vs. AMZN

Last updated Jun 12, 2026

VWRA.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, VWRA.L returned 10.40%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for AMZN. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VWRA.L vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRA.L achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly higher than AMZN's 4.63% return.

VWRA.L

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: 7.71%
• 6M: 8.53%
• 1Y: 22.70%
• 3Y*: 19.39%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: —

AMZN

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -9.15%
• YTD: 4.63%
• 6M: 4.88%
• 1Y: 13.28%
• 3Y*: 24.03%
• 5Y*: 7.61%
• 10Y*: 21.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRA.L vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VWRA.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	7.71%	22.45%	17.65%	22.28%	-18.11%	18.46%	16.19%	7.42%
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc	4.63%	5.21%	44.39%	80.88%	-49.62%	2.38%	76.26%	-6.94%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRA.L and AMZN is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2019	0.37

Return for Risk

VWRA.L vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRA.L

VWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
VWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
VWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

AMZN

AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 56
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 52
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRA.L vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VWRA.L	AMZN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	0.44	+1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	0.82	+1.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.10	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	0.61	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.51	1.45	+9.05

VWRA.L vs. AMZN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the AMZN Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRA.L and AMZN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VWRA.L vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRA.L and AMZN.

Drawdown Indicators

	VWRA.L	AMZN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.62%	-94.40%	+60.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-21.74%	+12.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.26%	-30.88%	+14.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.06%	-56.15%	+30.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.20%	-12.17%	+7.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.37%	-28.19%	+22.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	9.17%	-7.01%

Volatility

VWRA.L vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VWRA.L) is 3.90%, while Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that VWRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VWRA.L	AMZN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.90%	8.18%	-4.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.02%	20.76%	-10.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.56%	30.18%	-17.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.36%	35.54%	-20.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.23%	32.48%	-15.25%

Dividends

VWRA.L vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison

Neither VWRA.L nor AMZN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VWRA.L and AMZN in my portfolio?

VWRA.L and AMZN have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.