VWID vs. PCLO
VWID (Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF) and PCLO (Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWID is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Value Index (net), while PCLO is a CLO fund actively managed by Virtus. VWID is passively managed, while PCLO is actively managed. Over the past year, VWID returned 27.11% vs 5.30% for PCLO. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VWID charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PCLO.
Performance
VWID vs. PCLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWID achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly higher than PCLO's 1.97% return.
VWID
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 12.61%
- 1Y
- 27.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.20%
- 10Y*
- —
PCLO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VWID vs. PCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VWID Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF | 7.96% | 41.70% | -2.53% |
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | 1.97% | 5.39% | 0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWID and PCLO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWID vs. PCLO — Risk / Return Rank
VWID
PCLO
VWID vs. PCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF (VWID) and Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWID | PCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 2.76 | -1.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 20.27 | -17.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.61 | 123.68 | -112.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWID | PCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 5.94 | -3.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 4.62 | -3.98 |
Drawdowns
VWID vs. PCLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWID drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than PCLO's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWID and PCLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWID | PCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.64% | -0.76% | -33.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | -0.26% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | 0.00% | -1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -0.03% | -4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 0.04% | +2.30% |
Volatility
VWID vs. PCLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF (VWID) is 0.00%, while Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF (PCLO) has a volatility of 0.25%. This indicates that VWID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWID | PCLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 0.25% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | 0.70% | +8.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.05% | 0.90% | +11.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 1.15% | +13.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 1.15% | +15.25% |
VWID vs. PCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWID has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLO's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
VWID vs. PCLO - Dividend Comparison
VWID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than PCLO's 5.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCLO Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | 5.27% | 5.53% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VWID Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF | 4.54% | 4.86% | 4.48% | 4.97% | 5.73% | 10.70% | 4.71% | 1.99% | 4.55% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWID and PCLO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCLO has higher volatility (0.25%) compared to VWID (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWID dropped -34.64% vs PCLO's -0.76%.
On 1-year performance, VWID leads with 27.11% vs 5.30% for PCLO. On fees, PCLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, VWID has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VWID has performed better with a 27.11% return vs 5.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PCLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for VWID.
PCLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 4.54% for VWID.
VWID is categorized as Dividend, while PCLO is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for VWID and 0.29% for PCLO.
PCLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.94 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWID and PCLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer