PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWCE.DE vs. XNAS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWCE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWCE.DE achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 20.53% return.


VWCE.DE

1D
1.82%
1M
0.89%
YTD
11.72%
6M
13.39%
1Y
26.35%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*

XNAS.DE

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.97%
YTD
20.53%
6M
22.04%
1Y
39.25%
3Y*
24.64%
5Y*
18.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWCE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VWCE.DE
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
11.72%9.16%24.41%18.18%-13.47%23.36%
XNAS.DE
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C
20.53%7.11%33.75%51.36%-29.99%31.23%

Correlation

The correlation between VWCE.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021

0.88

The correlation between VWCE.DE and XNAS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWCE.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWCE.DE
VWCE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VWCE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWCE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XNAS.DE
XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWCE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWCE.DEXNAS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

3.77

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.07

11.16

+4.91

VWCE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWCE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWCE.DE and XNAS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWCE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWCE.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.43%, which is greater than XNAS.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWCE.DE and XNAS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWCE.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.43%

-31.25%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-10.00%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.07%

-26.72%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.07%

-31.25%

+10.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-0.83%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-7.83%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

3.38%

-1.78%

Volatility

VWCE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE.DE) is 3.40%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that VWCE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWCE.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

4.31%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

10.91%

-2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

15.71%

-4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.79%

19.88%

-6.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

19.85%

-3.69%

VWCE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWCE.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWCE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither VWCE.DE nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VWCE.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWCE.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWCE.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAS.DE.

VWCE.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. VWCE.DE tracks FTSE All-World Index, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for VWCE.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWCE.DE and XNAS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer