VVSGX vs. CTSIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VVSGX (VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund) and CTSIX (Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, VVSGX returned 12.47%/yr vs 35.13%/yr for CTSIX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VVSGX charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CTSIX.

Performance

VVSGX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVSGX achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than CTSIX's 35.59% return.

VVSGX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 3.94%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 6M: 10.02%
• 1Y: 22.46%
• 3Y*: 12.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CTSIX

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: 11.15%
• YTD: 35.59%
• 6M: 35.33%
• 1Y: 68.24%
• 3Y*: 35.13%
• 5Y*: 11.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VVSGX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
VVSGX VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund	11.32%	8.99%	10.85%	14.20%	-32.21%	-3.59%
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	35.59%	25.90%	44.34%	7.57%	-37.30%	-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VVSGX and CTSIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2021	0.90

The correlation between VVSGX and CTSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VVSGX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVSGX

VVSGX Risk / Return Rank: 23
VVSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
VVSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
VVSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
VVSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
VVSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

CTSIX

CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 75
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVSGX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VVSGX	CTSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	2.52	-1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	3.18	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.40	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	5.65	-3.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.35	23.22	-15.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VVSGX vs. CTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the CTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVSGX and CTSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VVSGX	CTSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.22	2.52	-1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.57	-0.57

Drawdowns

VVSGX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVSGX drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, smaller than the maximum CTSIX drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVSGX and CTSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VVSGX	CTSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.74%	-50.83%	+6.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.47%	-12.38%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.74%	-28.40%	+2.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.09%	0.00%	-7.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.82%	-20.64%	-4.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	3.00%	+0.30%

Volatility

VVSGX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) is 6.31%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 9.40%. This indicates that VVSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VVSGX	CTSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.31%	9.40%	-3.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.08%	21.29%	-6.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.94%	27.70%	-7.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.02%	28.00%	-2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.02%	29.78%	-4.76%

VVSGX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVSGX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

VVSGX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison

VVSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, while CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.77%	4.95%
VVSGX VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund	2.23%	0.00%	0.00%	7.74%	10.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VVSGX and CTSIX in my portfolio?

VVSGX and CTSIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VVSGX or CTSIX?

CTSIX has higher volatility (9.40%) compared to VVSGX (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VVSGX dropped -44.74% vs CTSIX's -50.83%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.