VVR vs. FCBYX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR) and Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX).

FCBYX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Jan 31, 2000.

Performance

VVR vs. FCBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR) and Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VVR vs. FCBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VVR Invesco Senior Income Trust	2.05%	-6.18%	8.97%	20.86%	-1.11%	17.00%	-0.22%	16.97%	-5.36%	0.19%
FCBYX Nuveen Strategic Income Fund	-0.67%	8.55%	6.86%	9.14%	-10.36%	1.47%	8.45%	13.18%	-3.07%	5.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVR achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly higher than FCBYX's -0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, VVR has outperformed FCBYX with an annualized return of 6.92%, while FCBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.42% annualized return.

VVR

• 1D: 3.87%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 2.05%
• 6M: -0.18%
• 1Y: -1.93%
• 3Y*: 8.46%
• 5Y*: 6.22%
• 10Y*: 6.92%

FCBYX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: -0.67%
• 6M: 0.76%
• 1Y: 5.49%
• 3Y*: 6.88%
• 5Y*: 2.97%
• 10Y*: 4.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

VVR vs. FCBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVR

VVR Risk / Return Rank: 36
VVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
VVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
VVR Omega Ratio Rank: 30
VVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
VVR Martin Ratio Rank: 40

FCBYX

FCBYX Risk / Return Rank: 91
FCBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FCBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FCBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FCBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FCBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVR vs. FCBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR) and Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VVR	FCBYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	1.97	-2.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	3.09	-3.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.43	-0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	2.55	-2.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.05	9.27	-9.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VVR vs. FCBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVR Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the FCBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVR and FCBYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VVR	FCBYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11	1.97	-2.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.73	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	1.05	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	1.07	-0.87

Correlation

The correlation between VVR and FCBYX is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

VVR vs. FCBYX - Dividend Comparison

VVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.16%, more than FCBYX's 5.59% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VVR Invesco Senior Income Trust	14.16%	13.94%	13.06%	11.54%	11.46%	7.22%	6.71%	6.22%	6.68%	5.95%	6.41%	7.97%
FCBYX Nuveen Strategic Income Fund	5.59%	6.22%	6.44%	5.59%	4.71%	3.08%	3.58%	3.69%	3.91%	4.92%	5.28%	5.53%

Drawdowns

VVR vs. FCBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVR drawdown since its inception was -73.79%, which is greater than FCBYX's maximum drawdown of -24.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVR and FCBYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VVR	FCBYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.79%	-24.49%	-49.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.65%	-2.43%	-10.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.50%	-15.74%	-3.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.92%	-15.93%	-39.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.55%	-2.19%	-8.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.89%	-2.41%	-8.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.17%	0.67%	+6.50%

Volatility

VVR vs. FCBYX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) at 0.89%. This indicates that VVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VVR	FCBYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.06%	0.89%	+6.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.18%	1.80%	+8.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.25%	3.13%	+15.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.70%	4.10%	+11.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.47%	4.21%	+19.26%