PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VVR vs. BKLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VVR vs. BKLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVR achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than BKLN's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, VVR has outperformed BKLN with an annualized return of 6.19%, while BKLN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.26% annualized return.


VVR

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
-0.57%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
-6.94%
3Y*
6.30%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*
6.19%

BKLN

1D
0.00%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.21%
6M
1.23%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
7.65%
5Y*
5.15%
10Y*
4.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VVR vs. BKLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VVR
Invesco Senior Income Trust
-0.57%-6.18%8.97%20.86%-1.11%17.00%-0.22%16.97%-5.36%0.19%
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
0.21%6.88%8.21%12.53%-2.51%2.32%1.32%10.03%-1.32%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between VVR and BKLN is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2011

0.30

The correlation between VVR and BKLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VVR vs. BKLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVR
VVR Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
VVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVR Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVR vs. BKLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VVRBKLNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.47

1.80

-2.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.58

2.67

-3.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.42

-0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

1.61

-2.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.65

6.36

-7.01

VVR vs. BKLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVR Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the BKLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVR and BKLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VVRBKLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

1.80

-2.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

1.16

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.67

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.64

-0.45

Drawdowns

VVR vs. BKLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVR drawdown since its inception was -73.79%, which is greater than BKLN's maximum drawdown of -24.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVR and BKLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVRBKLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.79%

-24.17%

-49.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-3.07%

-9.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

-3.55%

-15.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-7.31%

-12.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.92%

-24.17%

-31.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.85%

-0.24%

-12.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.90%

-1.09%

-9.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.02%

0.78%

+7.24%

Volatility

VVR vs. BKLN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) at 0.45%. This indicates that VVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVRBKLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

0.45%

+3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.76%

2.53%

+9.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.05%

2.75%

+12.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

4.47%

+11.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.58%

6.43%

+17.15%

Dividends

VVR vs. BKLN - Dividend Comparison

VVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.56%, more than BKLN's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
6.61%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%
VVR
Invesco Senior Income Trust
14.56%13.94%13.06%11.54%11.46%7.22%6.71%6.22%6.68%5.95%6.41%7.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


VVR and BKLN have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VVR has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to BKLN (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VVR dropped -73.79% vs BKLN's -24.17%.

BKLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VVR and BKLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer