VVR vs. VLT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VVR (Invesco Senior Income Trust) and VLT (Invesco High Income Trust II) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, VVR returned 5.98%/yr vs 6.47%/yr for VLT. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VVR vs. VLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR) and Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVR achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly lower than VLT's -2.21% return. Over the past 10 years, VVR has underperformed VLT with an annualized return of 5.98%, while VLT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.47% annualized return.

VVR

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: -2.51%
• 6M: -1.97%
• 1Y: -8.03%
• 3Y*: 5.60%
• 5Y*: 4.79%
• 10Y*: 5.98%

VLT

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: -2.21%
• 6M: -0.98%
• 1Y: 8.60%
• 3Y*: 11.91%
• 5Y*: 3.82%
• 10Y*: 6.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VVR vs. VLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VVR Invesco Senior Income Trust	-2.51%	-6.18%	8.97%	20.86%	-1.11%	17.00%	-0.22%	16.97%	-5.36%	0.19%
VLT Invesco High Income Trust II	-2.21%	13.22%	17.38%	13.12%	-20.82%	14.53%	4.46%	23.60%	-7.97%	10.68%

Correlation

The correlation between VVR and VLT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 1998	0.23

The correlation between VVR and VLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap VVR : $463.31M VLT : $68.11M
EPS VVR : $0.35 VLT : $1.84
PE Ratio VVR : 8.62 VLT : 5.67
PEG Ratio VVR : 0.00 VLT : 0.02
PS Ratio VVR : 4.76 VLT : 4.11
PB Ratio VVR : 0.87 VLT : 0.95
Total Revenue (TTM) VVR : $97.40M VLT : $16.55M
Gross Profit (TTM) VVR : $66.80M VLT : $13.85M
EBITDA (TTM) VVR : $71.31M VLT : $16.82M

Return for Risk

VVR vs. VLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVR

VVR Risk / Return Rank: 17
VVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
VVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
VVR Omega Ratio Rank: 17
VVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
VVR Martin Ratio Rank: 20

VLT

VLT Risk / Return Rank: 66
VLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
VLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
VLT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
VLT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVR vs. VLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR) and Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VVR	VLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	1.07	-1.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.69	1.62	-2.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.21	-0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.64	0.82	-1.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.00	2.92	-3.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VVR vs. VLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVR Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the VLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVR and VLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VVR	VLT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.54	1.07	-1.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.33	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	0.47	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.14	+0.04

Drawdowns

VVR vs. VLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVR drawdown since its inception was -73.79%, roughly equal to the maximum VLT drawdown of -75.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVR and VLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	VVR	VLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.79%	-75.78%	+1.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.65%	-10.55%	-2.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.50%	-13.41%	-6.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.50%	-30.46%	+10.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.92%	-42.02%	-13.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.56%	-3.42%	-11.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.90%	-16.95%	+6.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.05%	2.95%	+5.10%

Volatility

VVR vs. VLT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Senior Income Trust (VVR) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) at 3.42%. This indicates that VVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VVR	VLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	3.42%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.83%	6.57%	+5.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.05%	8.05%	+7.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.04%	11.72%	+4.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.59%	13.93%	+9.66%

Dividends

VVR vs. VLT - Dividend Comparison

VVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.85%, more than VLT's 10.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VLT Invesco High Income Trust II	10.78%	10.27%	10.55%	11.13%	11.27%	8.06%	8.51%	8.10%	8.44%	7.00%	8.06%	9.71%
VVR Invesco Senior Income Trust	14.85%	13.94%	13.06%	11.54%	11.46%	7.22%	6.71%	6.22%	6.68%	5.95%	6.41%	7.97%

Financials

VVR vs. VLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Invesco Senior Income Trust and Invesco High Income Trust II over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

VVR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invesco Senior Income Trust reported a gross profit of 19.26M and revenue of 23.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.6%.

VLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invesco High Income Trust II reported a gross profit of 3.93M and revenue of 4.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 90.4%.

VVR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invesco Senior Income Trust reported an operating income of 4.92M and revenue of 23.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

VLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invesco High Income Trust II reported an operating income of 3.15M and revenue of 4.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 72.5%.

VVR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invesco Senior Income Trust reported a net income of -3.05M and revenue of 23.90M, resulting in a net margin of -12.7%.

VLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Invesco High Income Trust II reported a net income of 2.38M and revenue of 4.35M, resulting in a net margin of 54.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VVR and VLT in my portfolio?

VVR and VLT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VVR or VLT?

VVR has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to VLT (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VVR dropped -73.79% vs VLT's -75.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.