PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VVO.TO vs. PZW.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VVO.TO vs. PZW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF (VVO.TO) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVO.TO achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly lower than PZW.TO's 17.33% return. Over the past 10 years, VVO.TO has underperformed PZW.TO with an annualized return of 7.27%, while PZW.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.60% annualized return.


VVO.TO

1D
0.14%
1M
0.81%
YTD
7.32%
6M
6.89%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
11.55%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
7.27%

PZW.TO

1D
0.29%
1M
3.40%
YTD
17.33%
6M
16.85%
1Y
32.19%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VVO.TO vs. PZW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
7.32%9.74%13.56%4.87%-5.18%10.43%-2.49%19.40%-2.10%14.32%
PZW.TO
Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF
17.33%18.48%16.03%12.88%-10.53%17.53%7.48%18.01%-8.08%13.64%

Correlation

The correlation between VVO.TO and PZW.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2016

0.26

The correlation between VVO.TO and PZW.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VVO.TO vs. PZW.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VVO.TO
PZW.TO

Technology

19.8%
12.2%

Healthcare

13.0%
12.7%

Financial Services

12.4%
13.3%

Communication Services

11.5%
3.8%

Industrials

10.5%
19.2%

Consumer Defensive

9.6%
4.6%

Utilities

7.4%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
12.1%

Energy

5.3%
4.1%

Real Estate

3.5%
8.8%

Basic Materials

0.5%
7.0%

Technology

VVO.TO
19.8%
PZW.TO
12.2%

Healthcare

VVO.TO
13.0%
PZW.TO
12.7%

Financial Services

VVO.TO
12.4%
PZW.TO
13.3%

Communication Services

VVO.TO
11.5%
PZW.TO
3.8%

Industrials

VVO.TO
10.5%
PZW.TO
19.2%

Consumer Defensive

VVO.TO
9.6%
PZW.TO
4.6%

Utilities

VVO.TO
7.4%
PZW.TO
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VVO.TO
6.6%
PZW.TO
12.1%

Energy

VVO.TO
5.3%
PZW.TO
4.1%

Real Estate

VVO.TO
3.5%
PZW.TO
8.8%

Basic Materials

VVO.TO
0.5%
PZW.TO
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VVO.TO vs. PZW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVO.TO
VVO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VVO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VVO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

PZW.TO
PZW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PZW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVO.TO vs. PZW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF (VVO.TO) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VVO.TOPZW.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.45

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

3.79

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.07

13.53

-7.47

VVO.TO vs. PZW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the PZW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVO.TO and PZW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VVO.TO vs. PZW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVO.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.20%, roughly equal to the maximum PZW.TO drawdown of -32.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVO.TO and PZW.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVO.TOPZW.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.20%

-32.45%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-8.50%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.98%

-16.88%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.37%

-22.13%

+7.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.20%

-32.45%

-0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-5.72%

+2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

2.38%

-0.63%

Volatility

VVO.TO vs. PZW.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF (VVO.TO) is 2.07%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that VVO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PZW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVO.TOPZW.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.07%

2.90%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.02%

10.41%

-4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.71%

14.17%

-6.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.82%

14.65%

-4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.02%

15.90%

-3.88%

Dividends

VVO.TO vs. PZW.TO - Dividend Comparison

VVO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than PZW.TO's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PZW.TO
Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF
1.65%1.97%2.12%3.23%1.90%1.93%1.52%2.26%1.78%1.57%1.09%0.96%
VVO.TO
Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility ETF
1.99%2.13%2.05%2.68%1.56%2.30%2.23%2.22%1.87%2.07%0.71%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VVO.TO and PZW.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VVO.TO tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while PZW.TO tracks 50% FTSE RAFI Developed ex US Mid-Small 1500 Index / 50% FTSE RAFI US 1500 Mid-Small Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VVO.TO and PZW.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer