PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZW.TO vs. PXC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZW.TO vs. PXC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO) and Invesco RAFI Canadian Index ETF (PXC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PZW.TO having a 17.33% return and PXC.TO slightly higher at 17.43%. Over the past 10 years, PZW.TO has underperformed PXC.TO with an annualized return of 11.60%, while PXC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.25% annualized return.


PZW.TO

1D
0.29%
1M
3.40%
YTD
17.33%
6M
16.85%
1Y
32.19%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
11.60%

PXC.TO

1D
-0.78%
1M
1.39%
YTD
17.43%
6M
17.10%
1Y
36.42%
3Y*
24.01%
5Y*
16.96%
10Y*
13.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZW.TO vs. PXC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PZW.TO
Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF
17.33%18.48%16.03%12.88%-10.53%17.53%7.48%18.01%-8.08%13.64%
PXC.TO
Invesco RAFI Canadian Index ETF
17.43%26.50%19.57%9.28%1.37%34.11%-1.11%19.11%-9.11%7.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PZW.TO and PXC.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2015

0.25

The correlation between PZW.TO and PXC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PZW.TO vs. PXC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PZW.TO
PXC.TO

Industrials

19.2%
7.2%

Financial Services

13.3%
34.7%

Healthcare

12.7%
0.2%

Technology

12.2%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
6.6%

Real Estate

8.8%
0.8%

Basic Materials

7.0%
13.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
2.9%

Energy

4.1%
26.6%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.7%

Utilities

2.3%
3.1%

Industrials

PZW.TO
19.2%
PXC.TO
7.2%

Financial Services

PZW.TO
13.3%
PXC.TO
34.7%

Healthcare

PZW.TO
12.7%
PXC.TO
0.2%

Technology

PZW.TO
12.2%
PXC.TO
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PZW.TO
12.1%
PXC.TO
6.6%

Real Estate

PZW.TO
8.8%
PXC.TO
0.8%

Basic Materials

PZW.TO
7.0%
PXC.TO
13.0%

Consumer Defensive

PZW.TO
4.6%
PXC.TO
2.9%

Energy

PZW.TO
4.1%
PXC.TO
26.6%

Communication Services

PZW.TO
3.8%
PXC.TO
2.7%

Utilities

PZW.TO
2.3%
PXC.TO
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZW.TO vs. PXC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZW.TO
PZW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PZW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

PXC.TO
PXC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PXC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PXC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZW.TO vs. PXC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO) and Invesco RAFI Canadian Index ETF (PXC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PZW.TOPXC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.69

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

7.88

-4.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

31.22

-17.69

PZW.TO vs. PXC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZW.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the PXC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZW.TO and PXC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PZW.TO vs. PXC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZW.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.45%, smaller than the maximum PXC.TO drawdown of -41.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZW.TO and PXC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZW.TOPXC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.45%

-41.78%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-4.64%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.88%

-10.99%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.13%

-15.75%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.45%

-41.78%

+9.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.03%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-5.04%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

1.17%

+1.21%

Volatility

PZW.TO vs. PXC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO) is 2.90%, while Invesco RAFI Canadian Index ETF (PXC.TO) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that PZW.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZW.TOPXC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

3.29%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.41%

7.80%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.17%

10.36%

+3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

13.27%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.90%

16.38%

-0.48%

Dividends

PZW.TO vs. PXC.TO - Dividend Comparison

PZW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than PXC.TO's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXC.TO
Invesco RAFI Canadian Index ETF
2.25%2.65%3.17%3.48%3.42%2.58%3.10%2.92%2.86%2.23%2.57%3.13%
PZW.TO
Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF
1.65%1.97%2.12%3.23%1.90%1.93%1.52%2.26%1.78%1.57%1.09%0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


PZW.TO and PXC.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PZW.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while PXC.TO is Canada Equities. PZW.TO tracks 50% FTSE RAFI Developed ex US Mid-Small 1500 Index / 50% FTSE RAFI US 1500 Mid-Small Index, while PXC.TO tracks RAFI Canada Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZW.TO and PXC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer